The once-beloved children’s author is working herself up over Scotland’s new bias law.


U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has jumped to defend J.K. Rowling, who is once again using her one wild and precious life to post obsessively about transgender women instead of doing literally anything else with her hundreds of millions of dollars.

The Harry Potter author took to X, formerly Twitter, on April 1 to share her thoughts on Scotland’s new Hate Crime Act, which went into effect the same day. The law criminalizes “stirring up hatred” related to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, trans identity, or being intersex, as the BBC reported. “Stirring up hatred” is further defined as communicating or behaving in a way “that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive” against a protected group. The offense is punishable by imprisonment of up to seven years, a fine, or both.

In response to the legislation, Rowling posted a long thread naming several prominent trans women in the U.K., including Mridul Wadhwa, the CEO of the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, and activist Munroe Bergdorf. Since it was April Fool’s day, Rowling decided to commemorate it by sarcastically affirming the womanhood of all the people she named in her thread. In the same breath that she said that a convicted child predator was “rightly sent to a women’s prison,” she also called out a number of trans women making anodyne comments about inclusion, seemingly implying that trans identity is inherently predatory.

read more: https://www.them.us/story/jk-rowling-rishi-sunak-social-media-trans

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hopefully the cops oblige her, but I’m pretty sure she’s too rich to actually experience any consequences.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah, wait till she decides she is properly untouchable and definitely crosses the line and the case is a slam dunk.

            • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Quote exactly some hate speech by her which is deserving of being locked up and link sources

              Not stuff which is considered offensive, but quotes which genuinely deserve jail time

              A proportionate response is banning of her social media accounts and any of her products which create revenue, not FUCKING JAIL.

              So please, quote away.

              • jak@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                if

                That’s a quote from my comment that you replied to.

                • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Holy shit really? You’re going with that?

                  You just turned the conversation on its head and then accused me of doing the same? hypocritical behaviour

                  Wait you think arresting her is proportionate?

                  If she sows hate speech? Yes.

                  What you really meant to say is: “no, arresting her isn’t proportionate, but she should be arrested if she does something she hasn’t done”

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Or for that matter having a different belief than the status quo

        Just because you disagree with something doesn’t mean you get to censor and arrest them

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Right? This could definitely be the first step towards State sanctioned group-think, and the loss of freedom of speech. I’m just as opposed to hate speech as any other progressive individual, but I do not trust these types of laws in the hands of governments that are moving rapidly towards fascism.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dedicated her life to drumming up transphobic hate. Pathetic

  • bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You have to wonder how a guy named Rishi Sunak justifies supporting her.

    But I guess it’s done so that people hate on trans people instead of people with a similar name or skin color as his. When in reality everyone just hates him because of his politics and personality

  • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    She got the money. No jailtime for her. If she was poor she would already br in jail by now.

  • Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hmm, ok. I need to start sorting by top instead of Hot