• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        14 days ago

        My wife had a forgotten bill get sent to small claims instead of actually contacting her. As soon as it hit the small claims court system she got inundated with ads from law firms offering to represent her

      • CO5MO ✨@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 days ago

        I would agree w this. Had a parent get into a minor fender bender & had to help field calls from multiple injury lawyers.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’ve never understood why things like this have to be a part of public record. Traffic accidents, traffic citations, bankruptcies, buying a house, and even getting divorced.

    All of those are very personal things that should never be a part of public record. And even if they are, the PII should not.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 days ago

      Simple improvement: Add a fee to access the personally identifiable information. And make the record of accessing the information public.

      Not perfect, but better.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        I believe some things (like DMV records) are fee based. But the fee is nominal and wouldn’t stop any predator from doing bad things if they are so inclined. The only thing adding fees does is to financially incentivize keeping the data online and accessible to anybody who pays.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        That wouldn’t fix anything. There would be a site reselling it for a lower price or a large subscription fee for a specific area.

        Almost anything made by governments is public domain so it’s legal.

            • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 days ago

              Accurate. I both misread your comment and I have a bee in my bonnet about a $20 fee to take pictures of something you can examine for free.

              • Kairos@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                They do that because they can. Write a letter to your mayor or executive of whatever municipality that is.

                • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Technically, it’s not been my municipality that’s charged me, but those around me and where I work. I don’t vote there. My town didn’t exist when the people I’m researching were making records. And at the state level, it comes up every few years but dies in committee. Last time was in 2020, when it died due to the pandemic changes everyone’s focus. I’ll ping my local congresscritter and see if it can be revived–the person advocating for change recently retired, sadly.

    • spookex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Say that under any thread about any billionaire and watch your comment get double digit downvotes

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I don’t like the existence of billionaires anymore than the next reasonably-sane pleb does. But someone’s financial/social status should never be a consideration to their constitutional right of privacy. You’ll just have to find some other way to harangue them for their behavior.