• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s almost always better for a company to have resignations than layoffs.

      So it’s kind of always been a thing for them to “encourage” resignations with shit like this, then hire back new people later for drastically lower salaries.

      It’s what a lot of places are doing now mandating return to the office.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Quiet hirings are a thing now too…

          Companies are putting up postings for positions they don’t have any intention of filling any time soon.

          This way when they are ready to hire, they finally look at resumes and can start scheduling interviews ASAP. It’s shifting all the wait time of the process to applicants.

          Combine the two, and you end up with companies being able to maintain bare minimum staffing regardless of workload without having to ever pay severance packages.

          It’s actually really smart, as long as you don’t have the tiniest shred of empathy and think of workers as machines and not people.

          • Aiyub@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Really explaibs how I got an answer to my application 14 month later. But they were consulting work companies. So you were hired when they needed a consultant with your profile.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I interviewed with one company I wanted to work at, but no answer after 2 months, so I interviewed elsewhere. That place had me start within a month. 6 months into working at my job, the first company said “ok, we are ready to schedule your start date”. I took that as a sign that it probably wouldn’t have been a great place to work.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s capitalism.

              It only works when the government backs citizens over companies. Because a public company is required to put profits over everything else.

              So there needs to be regulations getting passed to keep blocking whatever new bullshit someone set up.

              All it would take would be requiring companies to have a start/end date on applications and only be able to hire from applications received in that window.

              It’s already how the federal government does hirings. The government gets a lot of shit, but they’ve got one of the best unions around.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That sounds good in theory but with layoffs you tend to at least aim to let the worst employees go. With resignations you have literally the opposite. The best people are the ones that will go and the best ones will go first as they can and will find a new job more easily.

        Not saying that they don’t do it for that reason but sometimes (and I’d say most times) people are just incompetent and do stupid shit like this.