I don’t know why, but many new users post several links and then delete their accounts after a couple of hours. This is happening a lot and it’s getting more frequent and uncomfortable. Are there any devs considering tagging noob accounts and or filtering new accounts posting in communties, or maybe there are other solutions? Thank you
Tesseract (t.lemmy.world) both badges and lets you filter new accounts. You can configure the number of a days an account is considered “new” from 1 to 30 days. Anything that’s filtered will be shown as a stub/collapsed item in the feed.
In the upcoming release (delayed due to personal issues but in progress), you can completely hide content from new accounts (versus just collapsing it) among other filters.
Additionally, (in the upcoming release) it will automatically hide content from users less than a week old who have deleted their accounts. This feature is a direct response to this “hit it and quit it” nonsense from the accounts you’re describing.
Great news, thanks! So it seems it’s seriously being addressed via your server or is this on lemmy.world Any ETA for next release? I’ll also check out the tesseract for now. Good luck on the personal matters.
Ed. just tried it out and many things like you said can be adjusted! good stuff.
Hi there, saw some good ideas coming by. Personally I like reading the news and its comments. I considered using Boost, but then I needed to accept them collect info for ads. So for now am using Connect & Jerboa. Haven’t tried Voyager lately, which also seems to tag new users, iiuc.
I also came across this pending suggestion for Lemmy on github.com, which mentions using community flairs . When implemented and used correctly by communities it might solve some issues if I understand correctly? lemmy issue1456
What do you think?
Boost gives a little icon to accounts under a week old. I don’t think there’s an option to filter them, but they’re at least a little more obvious.
Voyager does it too for accounts under 1 month old.
I have always been in favor of a probation period before allowing posting. I honestly don’t understand peoples need to post before experiencing the community.
Publicity crap? That was a problem on forums.
Publicity crap?
The ones I’m talking about are regular posts with news links in worldnews and in the europe community.
Lots of us block all news posts simply because we want to get away from it.
But those folks try to get around our blocks because they feel the news is too important.
I have too many other ways to see the news, as it is. I browse here to do other things.
Maybe they’re just discovering that the regular form of Lemmy is terrible and the old.lemmy is currently broken. So not worth engaging with at all? I’m HATING being forced to use the regular version. The only upside is the posts actually expand when you click on them. Not being able to simply continuing to scroll downward is a pain in the ass.
Lemmy has severe problems with community integrity. The more traction it gains, the more you’re going to see spam, bots, vote manipulation etc. There’s very little it offers to mitigate that.
/discussion
I wonder how one could help mitigate any of it. Let’s say we looked at piefed. From what I have have seen published by instances is that the IP from a user is recorded for 12 months at registration, and all IPs a user logs in from are recorded for 90 days. That would mean cross referencing logs may be possible to catch multiple accounts logging in fron the same location but I would assume (maybe without understanding) since many users I discuss things with use a VPN throughout much of their usage the VPN companies would have severe overlap in what IPs are being used during login/registration over time. This would cause issues trying to recognize patterns. Like say I wrote a script that told an account to log into a VPN sever, login to an account in a database, make a post/comments, then log out of that account, out of the VPN, into another VPN sever, into another account and continue on doing so the IP would keep changing. Is there any way you could really verify it is the same user without putting in extensive tracking of users. Aka you could try to track browser uniqueness would make the bots more catchable but you are also the tracking the user base more, making it have even less privacy. The bot could then add something to alter browser settings used to obscure the uniqueness between logins, but really in the end what would the upsides be compared to the downsides. Ultimately it may create a constant heightened security that ends with all users being very non-anonymous across the platforms and still have bots just changing one more setting
IP logging is only relevant if an user sticks to one instance. I (transparently) swapped from Sopuli to this one (because I like the domain name) and realized that it really doesn’t take a lot of effort to make an account on any instance one comes across. I looked at the ones that pop up in the All feed and I think like one of them had a requirement to link an pre-existing social media profile. Everything else was at most “tell us a little about yourself” which is a pretty insignificant hurdle. And ultimately, as you point out, there’s always VPNs. Which I suspect are actually even more popular than average on Lemmy as I think people here are inclined to be more techy. I also suspect increasing tracking would kinda go against the appeal of Lemmy in general. Furthermore, it may create the issue where the efforts to prevent malicious users makes the service more unappealing to regular users but doesn’t actually really prevent even slightly organized troll campaigns.
My opinion is that they should do away with voting entirely for one measure. It’s low-effort engagement that has been one of the biggest problems in modern social media. Active threads could be more about unique users posts and Hot just post amount (as Hot could easily be two people having an argument). If something is worth engaging with, ACTUALLY ENGAGE WITH IT. Comment, share your thoughts. Ask questions. Instance admins would still of course have to deal with malicious accounts but they’re easier to spot when they can’t just subtly manipulate content by votes. I know they can see who voted and how on any given post but that’s a few clicks away and they’d have to be somehow prompted to actually take a look. And then they’d have to investigate every account and try to figure out if they are actually legitimate users or malicious. Unless the user is in their instance, they can’t even see their votes on other posts directly. They’d have to coordinate with the user’s instance admin which I wouldn’t put a lot of faith in. Significant effort for a job that’s already pretty thankless. However, if the only engagement people can do is actually posting, that becomes easier. You can see user’s post history and 0-effort trolls stand out quickly. They also already should have rate limiting, which prevents users from creating new posts unnaturally fast (I imagine this is stricter on posts than votes).
It’s not that much of a problem YET, I don’t think. I browse by All - New because I use Opt-out protocol (blocking communities I’m not interested in) as opposed to Opt-in (Subbing, though I do sub to what I really care about). I’m not sure how many others do this but Lemmy moves slowly enough for this to be viable and it mostly neutralizes vote-manipulation for me personally. While I would like to see Lemmy gain traction, it would also mean my system would start breaking down, making sorting by active more appealing - which would bring back the issue of vote manipulation.
Edit: Oh and yeah, maybe at least remove Downvote option? My instance does. That would help a tiny bit.
