• Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but AI doesn’t consume drinkable water. It’s used for cooling. What UK water consumption are we talking about here ? Is it the total water consumption including farming and industrial, or just fresh water ? What is the source for this information?

    I also believe that the AI craz is wasteful usage of precision ressources. But I find this data rather lacking in details.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Blockchain currencies and now ‘AI’ (glorified pattern matchers)… I wonder what the next huge energy/resource sink grift will be? I want to know so I can get in early, make a zillion and dump before everyone realizes how stupid and wasteful it all was.

    What pisses me off is that LLMs are such a brute-force ‘solution’ that goes against one of the major goals of Computer Science – to find algorithms that take less time and energy, instead of just throwing more compute cycles at things.

    Hell, blockchain at least had a mathematical justification for why it needed such huge compute/power resources (proof of work).

    • luluu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree that LLMs being used as they are is a major waste. However, I don’t think it goes against any goals of CS. Computer Science has traditionally followed this pattern: discover a solution that works, enhance it, and then repeat the process as needed. Transformers are the newest best solution for some NLP tasks, and a hype was created. We’ll be back to the enhance phase shortly. Hopefully with a little less overhype and more consideration this time.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Totally agree with this take.

        The hype has been there everytime we discovered something big. Only this time the hype overshadows the discovery a bit. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t expect our scientific progress to revert back to this known pattern again.