renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1507
arrow-up1507imageThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·24 hours agoI really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
minus-squareJusticeForPorygon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-220 hours agoNo one: deranger@sh.itjust.works:
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 hours agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-218 hours agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·57 minutes ago“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.
I really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
No one:
deranger@sh.itjust.works:
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.
“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.