Now that we have final numbers. It appears that Harris had all the white & black support she needed for an EC victory. But Trump outright flipping Latino men and making huge gains with Latino women seems to have made all the difference.

What do you think?

First image is 2024, second is 2020.

    • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Collumn 1 is Percentage that voted for the Winner (Republican 2024/Democrat 2020), Column 2 the Loser, Column 3 is the percentage of the people polled.

      So row Latino men: 55% voted for Trump, 43% Voted for Harris, and 6% of the exit poll said they were Latino men.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The first two columns is what percentage each party receive for that particular demographic. The third column is the percentage that demographic made up of the total votes.

      So the each rows first two columns should add the 100%. The final column should add to 100%.

  • Landless2029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Kamala lost because the Dems didn’t show up. Again. Look at the number of votes for 2020 vs 2024. All those “undecided” and “obstainers” that didn’t just stay home. They didn’t bother doing a mail in.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Since Trump’s number one message was about immigration, it makes me wonder how Latinos took that message. A bystanding white person might think that US Latinos should be appalled at the way Trump painted Mexican immigrants as criminals.

    But then again, maybe Mexican immigrants who’ve been in the US a while look down on those recently arriving, or don’t want more of them to compete with. After all if you are a Mexican immigrant, you probably compete with other Mexican immigrants for work on some level.

    So there again we have the failure of identity politics. It’s about simple “me” economics, not “we” identity.

    • Mark@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Oh no doubt in my mind it’s the same as the stockholm syndrome afflicted gay men who were all over social media supporting Trump. It doesn’t matter what the Republican party does or says, men in the US want to support it and delude themselves that they aren’t it’s targets.

  • Revonult@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    White people voting for the right is the problem. Like how can we go on here and blame Latinos for shifting when such a high percentage of white people voted for him? Especially when you factor in the population size and not just % left or right.

    I am ashamed of my peers.

  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I know! Let’s blame EVERYBODY. That way nobody is left out and we can just admit we ALL fucked up so next time we can constructively work together to NOT fuck up instead of slinging mud at each other for the next four years.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      not gonna happen. harris supporters still think genociding and massive wealth inequalities are okay. dems have lost my vote nationally until they start supporting labor and stop fucking warmongering.

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Whole thread full of people blaming an entire race and sex whether that’s Latinos, Latino men, Whites, or White men. You ask a stupid question and you get stupid answers.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Please be careful whenever you ask these questions. It’s so easy to blame one single minority group for a widespread failure. Of course analysis of individual voting groups is legitimate, as long as you properly frame what you’re doing.

    This is a serious issue both because of the connection with racism (i.e., it’s the Latinos’ fault) and abdication of responsibility (i.e., we bear no responsibility).

      • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        15 million of them. That is a staggering number.

        It’s also not an accurate number. The official count for Biden in 2020 was about 81.3 million (found many places online, but the official one is a good choice) and the unofficial count for Harris by AP so far is about 74.3 million. That’s about 7 million, which is less than half of what you claimed.

        People have got to stop just posting straight up false information. If you don’t know, don’t post.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            21 hours ago

            No, if you said it a week ago it would be outdated. The fact that you’re still saying it is what makes it false. As you point it out new information is available. You’re just using old information still.

            By comparison if I wrote a book in the 1600s about the medical necessity of leaching, that would be outdated today. If I wrote a book about the medical necessity of leaching in 2024 that would just be false.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I didn’t write a book or claim to be an authority on the subject. I stated what I remember on a subject I had read an article about 2 weeks ago.

          • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            We both know the reasonable way to interpret your post, and the way nearly everybody would interpret it, is that that’s the current or final count. It’s also outdated to say 74 million fewer people voted for Harris, but at one point, that was in fact the count. But it’s more than outdated - it’s misleading to the point of being factually inaccurate to any observer.

            I can’t believe instead of being like “oh shit, I made a mistake, my bad, I better think for a second about this in the future” you’re going to try to justify it. Whatever, that’s social media at this point I guess. Surely I’m not the problem, says everybody feeding misinformation in a giant circle. I thought Lemmy might be better, but it’s just not. Thank you for convincing me to finally give all social media up.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I didn’t know it was outdated at the time. I don’t constantly check and double things I read in passing to see if it has been updated. I am not a professional in the field.

  • sygnius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    As a data analyst, the way the two graphs are setup terribly. There’s really not enough information to come up with any conclusions from the charts.

    Also, first, there’s not enough information from the graphs to determine the situation since it’s only by percentages and not population. Second, our system is based on the winners of each state and used by the electoral votes. So overall popular vote isn’t going to determine who got elected, even if the chart showed all blue for all demographics.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If that lasr column is population, latino men are 1/7 compared to white men. So the larger difference is much smaller than it appears. And how did there get to be so many more latino women than men.

  • Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Your narrative is that Latinos “shifted right” but I think this is a false framing- it was the Biden/Harris administration that shifted hard right on its proposed immigration policies and it left many Latino voters feeling politically abandoned.

    Look at the Democrats’ 2024 immigration bill- it is deportations, immigration quotas, and building the wall - while including nothing “left of center” such as amnesty. It is literally a Trump 2016 wishlist.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I think you’re trying to force a narrative on to this that doesn’t exist. You’re assuming that many of these Latino voters are against harder immigration policy. Polls are telling us the opposite. Poles are telling us that a lot of these Latinos that voted for Trump want this. They didn’t think Biden was too strong on immigration they thought he was too weak.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      wow, you answer one question about abortion by saying immigrants are rapists and suddenly people feel abandoned. tsk tsk.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This literally makes no sense. That immigration bill was bipartisan. And if Latinos felt Dems shifted to far right (which is laughable if you actually look at the policies), why would they vote even further right? THAT MAKES NO SENSE!