Morph9@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoCorkscrewlemmy.zipimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1490
arrow-up1490imageCorkscrewlemmy.zipMorph9@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up55·1 month agoI think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
minus-squareDe_Narm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoOkay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
minus-squarejuliebean@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 month agoi think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 month agoTwo many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThe ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.
I think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
Okay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
i think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
Two many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
The ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.