(all the pictures in the slideshow are of tower bridge too)

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point they should just rename it.

    London bridge can be renamed to “Disappointing Bridge”.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The kicker is that the original London Bridge is not even located in London. It was sold and then transported to the USA.

      • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lake Havasu City, Arizona! Fun facts:

        The bridge was bought by Robert McCulloch of McCulloch Chainsaws with his vision of a planned community in the Mojave desert.

        All of the bricks were numbered, and they were dismantled and reassembled in a specific order. The bridge was built, not over an actual channel, it was built on a peninsula, and the channel was dug out afterwards.

        While he was not the highest bidder on the bridge, the British government appreciated how he calculated his bid by accounting for a value of each brick in relation to the number of people living in England at the time.

        The man who designed the roads in Disneyland designed the roads in Lake Havasu City. The only straight road is the highway.

        The city did not want to pay for the cost of doves at the opening ceremony. They paid for pigeons that were painted white and they became an invasive species in the city.

          • makyo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Here’s the thing. You said a “dove is a pigeon.”

            Is it in the same family? Yes. No one’s arguing that.

            As someone who is a scientist who studies pigeons, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls pigeons doves. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.

            If you’re saying “pigeon family” you’re referring to the taxonomic grouping of Columbidae, which includes things from pigeons to doves to pigeons.

            So your reasoning for calling a pigeons a dove is because random people “call the white ones doves?” Let’s get gulls and pelicans in there, then, too.

            Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. A dove is a dove and a member of the pigeon family. But that’s not what you said. You said a dove is a pigeon, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the pigeon family pigeons, which means you’d call doves, pigeons, and other birds pigeons, too. Which you said you don’t.

            It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?