• TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      well whether popular doesn’t neceserally mean ungood. though I’m pretty skeptical when it comes to search engines as the amount they have to build up information wise to potentially be good is pretty extreme, it’s unlikely that someone could accomplish it without actually being known

      edit: oh shit, it’s just AI crap… nevermind any of my potential it’s not impossible that a hidden gem would be feasilble it’s AI crap. No nobody needs a search engine to bring up something that you can’t verify if it’s credible information or just random guesses made by what’s popular on the internet… completely worthless.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    Wot? Perplexity ai, that app that I have on my phone and that I sometimes ask random things when I want to be angry at something and that gives entirely useless and wrong answers 95% of the time? lollmaoeven

  • murky0106@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    It is good for answering simple questions. It isn’t a search engine its more of an answers engine wherby you ask something and it will do the search and procure the answer from the results. It works well most of the time however like all AI it hulicinates so if you ask it something too complex it isnt very good.

  • LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Maybe not now, but in future, with more accurate results, AI powered search will be preferred by majority, because of the convenience.

    • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      When the citations are on point, I like AI search. 9 times out of 10 I care enough to read the source though.

      However, there are still way too many hallucinations when it comes to sources in my experience. It just wastes my time when I go to verify and find that AI just spat out garbage.

  • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Anyone have an opinion on Perplexity compared to Brave Search?

    I really value Brave having their own independent search index. Google, Bing, and Yandex have dominated the space for quite some time.

    I know Perplexity claims to have a small / curated independent index, but I’m not really sure how true that is.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Brave has been surprisingly solid in my experience. I have noticed they tend to be lacking on image results though.

    • Jackoamon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Can’t say much in regards to perplexity, but I find kagi’s index to be quite nice. Especially if you find fortune forum posts helpful (which I do as a software dev). It’s paid only, so there’s no advertising incentive to the company and also a ton of configuration. I search a lot, so I went with the 10 dollar plan. 5 bucks gets you 300 searches a month, 10 is unlimited plus access to their LLM which documents information sources like perplexity.

      Personally, I found perplexity to be quite annoying with the more ai focused UI and trying to learn your interests. Kagi is a search engine first plus some other features they’re developing.

  • ebolapie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    The best search engine for my money is kagi. It’s $5 a month but there’s no ads, I get to block pinterest and I downranked fandom wikis. There’s even a fediverse filter.