neither are cartilages, yet they’re a part of the skeleton

???

Now I want to know what flibbar is

Hyperbolic-earthers approve.

hyperbolic-earthers you mean :D

true enough. In a way I prefer futile attempts being made than nothing at all though.

Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

and the music

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Just to confuse him, wait five minutes then eat just one of them.

https://youtu.be/gihOrSdfEPs

I love stomp

I liked gnome for its minimalistic UI. I then realized i3 does that better :D

Not the article, the commenter before you points at a deeper issue.

It doesn’t matter how if your prompt tells it not to lie is it isn’t actually capable of following that instruction.

I assume they’re talking about the design and training, not the prompt.

I still see it too, interestingly

if someone has ideas, I say let them cook. Open sourcing this can’t be bad for anyone imo.

Though I agree in a way, I don’t understand what anyone found potentially useful with this thing in the first place.

as digitized almost all societal functions are, we really should define basic internet access as a human right.

This varies from place to place. This is handled really badly in some places and much better in others.