Ideally it should be 0% (this is too optomistic, but I am not one make that figure) people pay into an insurance system to distribute risk. If a company cant resolve the inflow/outflow problem (not even going to get into profits, for-profit insurance is unethical) then it needs to be managed by an organization that can. ~30 governments (USA not amongst them) that have solved this problem for their citizens and anyone requiring medical assistance within their borders.
Well good news, we don’t have that system. You don’t magically wish your favorite legislature into existence after 24 kills, this isn’t a call of duty lobby with kill streak rewards.
Ideally it should be 0% (this is too optomistic, but I am not one make that figure) people pay into an insurance system to distribute risk. If a company cant resolve the inflow/outflow problem (not even going to get into profits, for-profit insurance is unethical) then it needs to be managed by an organization that can. ~30 governments (USA not amongst them) that have solved this problem for their citizens and anyone requiring medical assistance within their borders.
Right right right all cool, but I was conversing with that other user who claimed nothing was getting approved.
deleted by creator
Love that
1 in 3 is bad
3 in 3 is worse
deleted by creator
I am the voice of “Don’t threaten to shoot up your local office building or post office.”
deleted by creator
Well good news, we don’t have that system. You don’t magically wish your favorite legislature into existence after 24 kills, this isn’t a call of duty lobby with kill streak rewards.
deleted by creator
This is an incredibly stupid hill to die on
If you think lying to promote terrorism is a better hill, idgaf what you think.