• RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s almost impossible to see the last two words because your brain is already reeling from the rest of the statement. It took me a few tries to finally parse it.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      I very slowly zoomed in on the actual words in the post.

      Started off processing “molecule” as “mole”, “solar system” as “galaxy”, and thinking “ha, don’t know if that’s true but it sounds both plausible and neat”.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        There are definitely more hydrogen atoms in a mole of water than stars in the Milky Way.

        The Milky Way has somewhere between 100 and 400 billion stars according to Wikipedia (1*10^11 to 4*10^11). A mole of water has 6.022*10^23 molecules in it, each of which has two hydrogen atoms in it for a total of 1.2044*10^24 hydrogen atoms.

        10^24 / 10^11 = 10^13 which is ten trillion. So, a mole of water has roughly ten trillion times as many hydrogen atoms as the Milky Way has stars.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Wasn’t thinking moles, not that technical, but it sounded plausible vs. the number of stars in the Milky Way.

        Wait…

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The glass of water is a bit misleading. Your brain starts thinking about all the water molecules inside. That’s all.