Spike is seen after arrest of telegram CEO Pavel Durov in France in august

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t get it, everyone complained that telegram didn’t shared data with law enforcement, now everyone complains that telegram started sharing it

    • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      everyone complained that telegram didn’t shared data

      Who complained? All I remember is that their crypto and security sucks and we should stop using it.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      My complaint wasn’t sharing data with law enforcement. It was more about whether or not they should be moderating their platform and banning accounts that intentionally violate the policy. I don’t necessarily have a problem with them sharing information with the police when it’s warranted and there is a credible threat, because nobody should be using something to plan to bomb a restaurant or sports game. But the arguments that I have seen (and made) were pretty much “yeah, you shouldn’t be allowed to plan to kill people on this platform with no moderation, especially when the chats aren’t even encrypted”.

      Even back when the CEO got arrested most of Lemmy was crying foul on that and a lot of comments I saw got downvoted for siding with the 'police state ".

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      Better, but still not great, because a lot of metadata gets collected even if the conversations themselves do not. Might I suggest SimpleX instead?

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          SimpleX gets a lot of things right. In particular:

          • no public identifiers
          • ability to chat anonymously
          • not dependent on centralized servers
          • multiple user profiles

          My main concern for them is that they are backed by several investors (some VCs) with no concrete public plan as to how to pay them back.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Im pretty sure matrix.org data has been and will be sharing data with law enforcement. Even if you use encryption, they collect loads of metadata. With smaller servers it depends on local jurisdiction i guess.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Matrix.org is one of my big concerns with Matrix, as it oversees most big groupchats. If you selfhost your server, chances are it is still observing some of your conversations due to just how big and prevalent it is.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The moment they start rolling out any closed or paid features and the immediate reaction of the community isnt forking the entire protocol, i will ditch matrix. Ive become very trigger happy with this stuff.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I am content with XMPP for now. I know it has some flaws but seems like Matrix brings more - such as heavier servers and most importantly for me - the “store everything” aspect.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course they will. They only company that has actually ever refused, to my knowledge, is lavabit, and that’s because they shut down their operations entirely when the gov demanded encryption keys due to Snowden.

        The fact that such an enormous portion of users and groups are on the matrix.org server is a huge problem.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you’re using encryption you probably don’t have much to worry about. The main problem is so many people don’t bother to encrypt their chats and make the assumption that their chats are encrypted. Yes, I think the default should be encryption turned on. But I also think this is user error, so.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Aren’t group chats unencrypted by design, with no option to encrypt? (I don’t know, I don’t use the app. Just something I vaguely recall somebody saying.)

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          No. You have to enable encryption individually. And it only works if everyone in the conversation has enabled encryption. But it is available.