Plus, you’re not owed a date just because you think you otherwise deserve consideration. Superficial or not, people are entitled to decide what relationships they want to engage with upon whatever criteria they want.
Might mean they miss out on certain experiences, but that’s not your problem.
It’s real in that it’s a human experience shared by some. It’s not real in that it’s not gender specific.
The real meme is the fact that some people continue to perpetuate these outdated gender stereotypes.
I don’t think so. You can “auto-read on scroll” in Settings, but you’d have to manually “clear all read” items in the kebab menu when you’re viewing your feed.
Edit: I think you can get the effect you’re looking for by going into Settings and turning on the auto-read and going into Settings > Account Settings and turning off “Show read posts”
Polyamory or single. Could be either one.
And it now costs twice as much to dine out. So there you go. Greedflation working as intended.
I agree, that would be handy, though I think the original design was to allow one to rise to the top organically (i.e. people are more likely to join the community with the most members). I don’t know how that’s actually playing out in reality, and having the ability to group them all would be useful.
Yeah, Mastodon has lists, so it’s definitely a feature that is possible to add server side.
Gotcha. That makes sense why that might be handy, if you have a lot of communities you keep up with.
There’s Home (Subscribed), Local, and All views. If I open All, I can see posts from communities all over the Fediverse, even ones that I haven’t subscribed to.
Is that what you’re looking for?
Crashes for me. Running a Pixel 4a.
They don’t like that there’s a chance their post will remain indexed on Mastodon even if they delete it.
I understand the integration concern, but it’s adorable that they think anything gets deleted from any of Zuck’s platforms.
But more to the point, that’s an interesting read, and I’ll have to compare Phanpy to my current choice: Fedilab. Like they said, there’s lots of clients and possibilities for clients, since the Fediverse code is fully open source.
I don’t care to integrate with Threads, since there’s plenty of people talking about plenty of topics on Mastodon (and all it takes to find them is following a hashtag), but for the people willingly exposing their feed to Zuckerberg, I’m sure they’ll be happy to know that the Fediverse still has a lot to offer.
Maybe Mastodon is better… (h/j)
It makes sense that they can do that, though, since Mastodon can, and Threads functions similarly to Mastodon.
Reporting is a much better method for moderation on Lemmy anyway. The mods here seem to actually care a lot more than they do in more centralized spaces.
So we should make it easier by federating?
I am for blocking Threads. You mentioned history, and history shows that nothing good comes of playing ball with Zuckerberg. We are not a commodity to be used by billionaires, and I feel that the Fediverse exists to at least partially prevent that.
And as for public info, we can’t stop people from scraping the data in other ways, but we also don’t need to directly facilitate it by federating. Why make it easier for Zuck to get access to the data?
Lastly, no matter what he says, Zuck can’t be trusted. I’m almost certain the entire reason he wants to use ActivityPub in the first place is to either gain access to the kinds of people who have left Facebook and Twitter and commodify them, or to somehow maneuver in such a way that it kills or cripples the Fediverse.
Either way, it’s a no from me. Fuck Zuck.
Recall is just a piece that sped up my transition (I have Pro, so Copilot is less of a problem for me). The final nail in the coffin was having to deal with a driver-update-checker that randomly uses 70% processor to do things like check for updates and send telemetry to Intel.
On Linux, I just have to run the usual update command, and it will be updated there, without sending gobs of telemetry to Fuckifiknow.