• uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    In Germany you instead have mandatory insurance

    Eeeeh. Isn’t UK mandatory insurance too?

    in the UK there’s public health system where you have the right to health care as a citizen

    Because it says as a citizen, not as a human being.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, it’s called national insurance, but that’s just the name they gave it when they started the national health service, state pension, and welfare for those out of work for whatever reason. It’s just taxation.

      It’s free healthcare, not mandatory insurance. Nobody has to ever deal with an insurance company and decisions about your healthcare aren’t made by profit motive driven companies.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If it does not cover all people, regardless of citizenship and residence, then I call it mandatory health insurance. Yes, it is state-run, but for me covering tourists too should be requirement for healthcare to be called universal.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I didn’t call it universal, I called it free. A lot of tourists are covered because of reciprocal agreements with their countries.

          It’s not mandatory health insurance because you’re covered whether you’ve paid the tax or not, cradle to grave, and the original hypothecated payments haven’t covered it for decades.

          It’s free healthcare. I disagree very strongly with some people having an immigration ruling that they have no recourse to public funds, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t free healthcare.