

great collection! love it.
great collection! love it.
There are all sorts of mechanisms in the USA to stop this from happening as well. However, Trump spent the first term embedding loyalists in the courts and congress, so there really is not much left to stop him. If the people who are there to act as a check on presidential power are in on the game, then who is left to enforce the law?
Prosecution takes a very long time and authoritarians move very quickly. Time is not on our side.
“We’re leaving X” would be the better translation, I think.
Almost looks like the inside of a piano key
Edit: just read the hints and it kinda fits
Now do Ted Cruz.
Censorship and bias are two different issues.
Censorship is a deliberate choice by the deployment. It comes from a realistic and demonstrated need to limit the misuse of the tool. Consider all the examples of people using early LLMs to generate plans for bombs, Nazi propaganda, revenge p*rn etc. Of course, once you begin to draw that line, you have to debate where the line is, and that falls to the lawyers and publicity departments.
Bias is trickier to deal with because it comes from the bias in the training data. I remember on example where a writer found that it was impossible to get the model to generate a black doctor treating a white patient. Imagine the racist chaos that ensued when they applied an LLM to criminal sentencing.
I am curious about how bias might be deliberately introduced into a model. We have seen the brute force method (eg “answer as though Donald Trump is the greatest American,” or whatever). However, if you could really control and fine tune the values directly, then even an “open source” model could be steered. As far as I know, the values are completely dependent on the training data. But it should be theoretically possible to “nudge” those values if you could develop a way to tune it.
Just a reminder, it’s very difficult to erase anything from the Fediverse and Lemmy chats are not private.
Also, if you have a headphone jack, you could use a 4-way headphone jack splitter and 4 of those little car audio bluetooth adapters. A little hacky, but it wouldn’t break the bank.
There are apps that will synchronize audio, like snapcast. But yes, you would need individual devices.
You can also find a device that is capable to send two BT signals but I’m guessing one that sends 4 might be pro audio level.
Self-help thrives on shallow platitudes. For a price, it will make you think that they’re deep platitudes and therefore you are deep for hearing and repeating them.
I’m not sure we are having the same conversation. You are talking about how Mastodon was not a good fit for you personally, maybe because of a bad server.
I’m saying that lots of people use it for all sorts of great things, and it’s an excellent option for a public health agency.
What are you talking about? It has a million active users. With an advertising budget of zero.
Too Bad it wasn’t Mastodon. They just chose a different corporate master
I wish the conversation happened before creating the community, but I don’t agree that locking a community immediately after creating it is the best way to build a resilient platform. Unless there is some kind of automatic link forwarding that I’m not aware of. I’m making assumptions about what “Redirect” means based on my knowledge.
Is this the best account to reach you by pm?
Great to see one of the classic great web apps get this kind of love and attention! Nice update. I can’t wait to test it out
“Well, you have to let us do a little harm.” ¯_(ツ)_/¯