• 0 Posts
  • 1.9K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 17th, 2025

help-circle
  • Never a bad time to mention that besides killing almost 3 people per day american cops also shoot a huge number of dogs per year.

    The Department of Justice estimates that American police officers shoot 10,000 pet dogs in the line of duty each year. It is impossible to ascertain a reliable number, however, because most law enforcement agencies do not maintain accurate records of animal killings. The tally may be substantially higher, and some suggest it could reach six figures.
    …some animals have been deliberately shot and killed under questionable circumstances, including through doors or while tied, running away, or hiding. Studies show that some officers shoot pets unnecessarily, recklessly, or in retaliation, and that subsequent civilian complaints are investigated inadequately. Moreover, not every animal that police officers shoot is a large dog that may be more likely to pose a genuine risk to human safety—or even a dog at all. Police claiming a threat to human safety have shot puppies, Chihuahuas, Miniature Dachshunds, and domestic cats, among other pets. In some tragic cases, bullets missed their nonhuman targets and injured or even killed human bystanders instead.


  • I’m glad she lost.

    More than a billion people lack safe drinking water and almost two and a half billion live without access to sanitation systems.
    It’s about getting people out of poverty, making sure multinationals don’t steal or pollute drinking water for their benefit,etc…
    That’s the reason why the UN and other organizations declared it a universal human right.
    Or on an individual level a dangerously dehydrated person in some desert should not be refused water.
    This woman’s situation having to buy a bottle is in no way comparable and frankly it’s insulting.
    That place is a high end ski resort.
    She shouldn’t be surprised when they don’t want to serve tap water.
    It’s a snobby attitude, “vulgar tap water is something the plebs drink!”
    The kind of place where they also charge extras for the smallest of services.
    We don’t have to like it but it’s the place she chose to stay in.
    In no way did she not have access to water. If she really wanted to drink tap water she could’ve filled a bottle in her undoubtedly fancy bathroom. But probably she didn’t want to look like the a cheapskate.
    So no, her human rights have not been violated.
    This is rich Karen drama queen behavior.



  • why and how would smokers contribute more?
    As I said, taxes are extremely high on tobacco. 85%
    Even disregarding the amount in general taxes smokers also pay for healthcare that alone is more than the cost of smoking to healthcare.
    Unfortunately couldn’t find the study I read but it came down to a few 100 million surplus (in NL).

    And yes not needing to pay pensions is a big part of the gains to to the state but also not having to pay for the plethora of other diseases the elderly invariably get.
    And while obese people indeed have premature mortality that is often preceded by decades of chronic illnesses and care.
    And same as smokers that includes increased risk of cancers.
    Unlike most smokers very obese people often can’t perform physical labor the average human can.
    There’s more, like logistics and how many hospital workers and specialized ambulances or equipment it takes to simply move the more extreme cases but I think this will do.
    To be clear, I’m not defending smoking but the argument of how they don’t want to help smokers (basically addicts and victims) because it costs their health system is wrong.
    Not to mention anti-social and selfish.
    As I mentioned in the other comment, that’s a slippery slope.


  • Dead wrong.
    The whole population benefits from what smokers pay.
    From a study in NL it shows that they generate far more than what it costs in healthcare.
    And it also said should the small percentage of smokers suddenly quit and live longer, the loss of income for the state and the extra cost of them living longer and needing more care would be unsustainable.

    And if you want to be selfish and not have solidarity then let’s start about the much bigger cost of the SELF-INFLICTED diabetic epidemic.
    They require an avg of 28 years of aid.
    And almost no country wants to tackle that because of their opportunistic politicians.
    Who cares about antagonizing a small percentage that smokes.
    But the many sugar addicts poisoning themselves are too important for their precious votes to touch.
    And those same hypocrite politicians can be seen regularly with a glass of alcohol (hard drugs) in their hand.
    And as an edit, I don’t want to pay for your skin cancer treatment also, should’ve stayed out of the sun.











  • Bloomcole@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldDon't be late
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some doctors (mine also) started charging 10 euro extra if you don’t show up.
    I think that’s fair since there is a shortage of doctors and it happens a lot causing long waiting times for others to get an appointment.
    Had it recently when I got confused on the date.
    Offered to pay the next time but he said I normally always show up so he let it be and asked the normal ridiculous 1 euro charge.
    I like my doctor.