The issue with your original comment is that it’s simplified on many levels beyond what is acceptable. China has companies working on delivering highest financial output regardless of other citizens and their rights to have fair share in produced goods. They are by no means controlled by workers (why would they accept e. g. 996?) nor creating fair rules to others economically (e.g. Taobao and their alghorims pushing many sellers to sell bellow profitable levels just to maintain visibility on their site). Put it also into wider perspective: China started to move forward in quality of life only after Deng. US system is by no means bad but it doesn’t make Chinese one perfect.

You don’t even realise how strong capitalism is in China.

I didn’t expect such paper to be questioned on pubpeer at all

Some even forget to remove unnecessary parts of the AI’s answer, check out first sentence of the abstract down there 👇

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468023024002402