If someone’s licking any of the transuranic elements I’m not sticking around to watch.
Some stuff should simply not exist in a lickable quantity.
If someone’s licking any of the transuranic elements I’m not sticking around to watch.
Some stuff should simply not exist in a lickable quantity.
Maybe some idiot shot straight up into the air?
At some point even the pope disagreed. Or well, one of them did. It was complicated.
Why did the United States enter the Vietnam War?
Not the easiest kind of question to answer with multiple choice…
One of the better uses I’ve seen involved using this perspective to turn what was effectively a maximum likelihood fit into a full Gaussian model to make the predicted probabilities more meaningful.
Not that it really matters much how the perspective is used, what’s important is that it’s there.
Depends, who’s choosing the experiment?
Just because you don’t know what the uncertainties are doesn’t mean they’re not there.
Most optimization problems can trivially be turned into a statistics problem.
Dissent is not creativity.
So none of the attackers managed to leave the scene after the police arrived?