Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I hate Musk more than anyone but holy shit this is embarrassing.
“BREAKING: I asked my magic 8 ball if trump wants to blow up the moon and it said Outlook Good!!! I have a degree in political science.”
Things have gotten so bad in just a few months that the stress has made her appear older
Holy based
They don’t know they’re a meme
This is great news for Mozilla
Does that include other people who only murder murderers? And yourself?
Consume the accumulated wealth, power, and privilege of the affluent elite in an act of radical socioeconomic retribution driven by the pursuit of equity and justice for the disenfranchised masses
That’s cause it keeps getting hotter
When there’s someone behind me with their brights on, i roll down the window and hold my palm over my left mirror so they can see me blocking the light (it has never worked)
No. You can raise concerns about a potential vulnerability without having identified a specific real-world method of exploitation.
A privacy-focused search should not potentially reveal to others that you searched something. My examples prove the possibility that it can do that. I’m sure there’s other examples that are less “weird”.
It was just an example but ok, let’s fix it.
You want to see if someone is nosy so you lie and tell them you were arrested in 2006. You check and see “John Doe arrest 2006” or “John Doe 2006 arrest” is cached.
You get the idea.
Unless the terms include a name or location. Plus Leta is not widely used.
Suppose you tell someone in secret that you were arrested. You know they use Leta, so you look up “John Doe arrest” later and see that it was just recently cached. You only told one person so it must have been them. You now know what someone searched because they used Leta.
I don’t like how it tells you when the results were cached. You can tell if and when a query was searched for by someone else.
Also related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven_paradox
That’s my favorite thing about it. Not only did the chat get under his skin, but he also failed to prove the starlink in-flight wifi capability - the reason he was streaming in the first place. He failed on all fronts