Great extra vid - HID TRACKING DEVICES IN DOLLS? HOLY…

For real. I hate it. I have a daughter who would l ove to interact with these characters…

Seeing my daughter hug the teenager or college kid dressed as a Panda or cartoon character and really glowing like, “I met the Panda…!” “I met Heartsping… Heartsping hugged me…!”

The idea of all this being interrupted is frustrating.

I agree with that. Especially on this level. I think it would actually be embarrassing to try to blame it on something like this.

You would also think at high profile performances that require flawless execution for the sake of your reputation, you would play the whole thing safe: look over everyone’s heads, even at fixed points of the wall or something else non-descript behind them, and to just really not let a single thing break your concentration…

I am not a professional singer and I am well aware of this advice, and I have used it when speaking before classrooms and such before, and always found it worked pretty flawlessly… No idea how you are a professional singer performing at the BAFTAs and it’s like, “Yeah, I’m really nervous, how about I start looking into the faces of famous people while performing? That’ll keep me on point…!”

This could be relevant:

There’s a reason Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez isn’t mentioning her fiancé Riley Roberts when she talks about freezing her eggs … TMZ has confirmed they broke up.

AOC and Riley actually split roughly two years ago, and called off their engagement, according to Puck’s Chief Washington Correspondent Leigh Ann Caldwell … who was first to report the couple’s demise.

Multiple sources on Capitol Hill tell TMZ, it’s felt like ages since the pair were seen together publicly. That’s not hyperbole … Riley and AOC were last photographed at 2021’s Met Gala.

About a year later, in May 2022, the congresswoman confirmed she and RR were engaged. While we’ve confirmed they’re dunzo, we can’t say for certain when the break-up went down.

TMZ

I have heard people suggest she would one day be a good Presidential candidate. That would seem to be the most likely endgame for AOC, would it not?

So, when does she plan on carrying her babies to term? Age 55? I do know of a woman doing that, but when one becomes a parent even at age 40, you become acutely aware of the ticking clock.

One of my buddies had his daughter at age 46 and, over beers, calmly stated that he was stressed because he realized that he would be retiring right as she enters university, which isn’t a small bill, and he realized that he would be statistically likely to be in sharp decline when she is the age at which most women get married and give birth…

I know another guy who made the decision to marry very late in life and sired a child at age 60 with a woman who was 40. The boy is 15 and he, at 75, already had his first week-long hospitalization for a heart attack. And, yes, I live in a country with socialized medicine and it still drained his bank account (lol).

It actually makes so much sense to do this classic move: married in college or shortly thereafter; immediately have 2, 3 kids in quick succession; youngest is 3 by the time you are 30, 31 and you have all the time in the world to relentlessly pursue your career.

But, really why I am very anti-progressive, even if it makes sense for AOC or a cancer researcher to freeze their eggs for later…

*Let’s not pretend that Melissa needs to put her life on pause for 25 years to climb the corporate ladder in your typical Small & Medium Enterprise cubicle farm job.

Stop pretending you are doing anything besides working for the guy.

And that’s the hilarious thing about the progressive left of Reddit and elsewhere: they see through the Capitalist system and are ready to crowd fund everything for everyone in this broken system, but they are fiercely loyal to the idea that the most respsonisble thing for you to do is to freeze your eggs so you can work better for the man.

Did anyone watch this know what happened? I heard he brandished a knife naked while on camera.

I did not know that detail.

However, considering how he has made his fortune… It is kosher to gossip about this.

I heard celebs would pay him to be gossiped about by him 😂

That is next level stuff

Yeah I noticed the name too

Yeah, not intervening to protect and serve a citizen who was being killed - is criminal under the good Samaritan ethos. You’re obliged to help each other in a healthy CONSERVATIVE society. That’s the social fabric conservatives are supposed to uphold and protect.

Herein lies the totality of your error…

Thao was in charge of crowd control. He arrived late to the scene, and his only task is to make sure that nothing funny happens from the crowd. His attention is not supposed to be on Floyd/Chauvin, because he would be failing in his police work if he was not focused on his task.

Even if you believe that Chauvin killed willingly in cold blood, there is no reason to believe that Thao did anything wrong since everyone who watched the video saw that the death was a subtle affair that did not involve some great tumult.

Cops should be helping people stay alive. That’s their job. Every cop whose more interested in cuffing someone as they’re bleeding out or worse beating/suffocating them disgusts me. It’s a total dereliction of their duty to the public, themselves, a sense of a moral code, and humanity.

You are describing the general goal of police work, and certainly all tasks an officer engages in should be toward that end, but let’s not ignore the fact that crowd control is normally a part of executing that task, and there is a division of labor.

A criminal whose alive, can live to be reformed. Citizens rights should outrank a cops drive to kill or punish “criminals”.

Agreed.

Meanwhile the cops in question usually get a transfer and a new job being a cop somewhere else. Those in the George Floyd case only got harsh sentences because of the publicity the case got.

… But it was not actually justice. It was the result of massive political pressure to convict them and give as extreme sentences as possible. It would become a plume in the hat of Minnesota’s DFL politicians and bureaucrats, and the whole of the Minneapolis legal system understood the assignment that was being given to them by the national media.

Cops in America must have learned the transfer-system from the vatican. Immoral groups keeping death-perverts in their ranks are as bad as pedophile protectors. That shit doesn’t fly in other countries. Cops actually get fired or moderate criminal sentences elsewhere - as a consequence of that happening regularly they’re better at their jobs, better at determining the public interest, and happier at work (less hated, more recognized as helpful).

Lol, geez.

Nah, man, if you think the West had to learn corruption from the Vatican, lol, idk, man.

Do you know people?

Fair, we probably do not agree on this but… Yes.

So, I first saw Perez Hilton in, I think, the early 2010s. He commented sharply on celebrity gossip, and for a while he had a YouTube that was pretty unique in the sense that it often provided the latest analysis on some random shit going on with celebs…

He got replaced by “random guys deep diving it and going a 45 minute ELI5 vid for all the people who don’t really know WTF these people are and why it’s such a big deal…”

But for a while, he would be high in the algorithm. I think he may have even had a full time, properly salaried gig with E! at some point.

I thought he was a witty, fun guy, and so I was saddened by this news in particular and clicked the link. Honestly, I haven’t seen anything he has done in probably 10 years.

Honestly, a lot of people care… Tons of sports nuts pay attention to certain schools for football and AAU basketball because usually the most elite high school athletes do transition into professional sports.

it’s also an indicator of what we can expect to be happening at some point in college athletics and women’s professional sports if we do not fight against it.

OK the video in this short news clip on YouTube isn’t as good as the X video which is unedited but it could be a reference point.

First of all, thank you for citing your source.

“I’ll go backstage before a show, and everyone’s getting dressed and ready and everything else. …You know, no men are anywhere. And I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant. And therefore I’m inspecting it. … Is everyone OK? You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.”

Yeah, he’s talking to Howard Stern, famous for racy interviews, and he said something stupid. But what I am imagining is a guy walking about, there is a commotion, and he is looking in on a group of women generally in their underwear, not unlike the swimwear they will be wearing on stage later, and the bulk of the women have already signed up to walk around half-naked in front of a large audience, even a large televised audience.

This isn’t exactly a 1:1 with charging into the girl’s volleyball team’s locker room unannounced.

It is someone saying something stupid on Howard Stern? Naturally, lol. But this is just like what you do with the grab them by the pussy comment.

Trump was clearly describing the willingness of women to sleep with wealthy celebrities. The thrust of the whole quote is

I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it.

Grabbing them by the pussy is a comical, hyperbolic way of describing the willingness of women to be sexual with billionaire celebrities.

Do you dispute the fact that women are like that? It’s not unlike how many men who are not single will, in the perfect sitting, make out with a strange woman who isn’t even particularly attractive if she makes a move, let alone a gorgeous woman.

I’ll repeat. I do not care about your worthless opinions concerning the law. The law is the law. It determined he is a rapist and made him pay for it.

The judge allowed virtually any ridiculous thing as evidence against Trump while drastically limited the ability of Trump to respond. He was found guilty of something else - as AI states:

No, Donald Trump has not been convicted of rape. However, a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, but did not find him liable for rape in the civil trial.

What does ‘liable’ mean here?

In that context, liable means legally responsible for harm under the specific claim being tried.

So when a jury says Trump is liable for sexual abuse (and defamation), it means they found he is responsible under the civil lawsuit’s standards—even if it’s not the same as a criminal conviction (which would require proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”).

And what are the civil lawsuit standards for being liable for sexual assault in the state of New York?

In New York civil cases, the standard for “liable” is typically the preponderance of the evidence standard—meaning the plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s conduct occurred and caused the harm is more likely true than not (often described as “more than 50%” likelihood). In contrast, criminal cases require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

For a civil sexual assault/sexual abuse claim specifically, that usually means the plaintiff must prove elements of the specific civil claim (for example, unwanted sexual contact/acts done without consent, and causation/damages) by a preponderance of the evidence, not by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

So a judge constructed a scenario where New York liberals were able to state they thought he did it in a venue that does not carry the weight of a criminal trial, because there is no way that could have ever gone to trial.

Let’s enjoy posting our own material for our own audiences

Translation: “I have a safe space and I don’t feel comfortable leaving it.”

Sorry bud. I didn’t come looking for you. This drivel showed up while I was scrolling.

The context is more that I do not particularly want to keep up the interaction.

Feel free to post right here, though of course turning the conservatives forum into a series of OPs bashing conservatives wouldn’t be acceptable, we do believe in free speech generally and so showing up to debate is more than welcome.

Sub & come again my man.

See, this could be interseting, though…

Let’s say that the cop was a 5’2" female holding a gun, and she opened fire on a much larger man who was coming to engage in a fist fight. The logic being, how am I at my size going to win a wrestling match against a much bigger opponent?

This same answer would be viable for a cop who is male and small of stature, right?

What about for an older cop who isn’t confident in his ability to win the fight?

Now, what about in this scenario where he has yelled for his son to go and pick up the gun, and there is a fear that the gun could be retrieved and used on him while engaging in a prolonged wrestling match with the suspect?

… And if it is understandable that a cop who is too small to win a physcal fight with the suspect can shoot him so his own gun isn’t used against them… Can the same logic apply to a cop who is roughly the same size as the opponent?

Regardless, there have to be standards that treat all equal before the law, and this is an example where you could debate either way… But, ultimately, are you comfortable asking officers to risk their own lives on a wrestling match with an erratic criminal that may just shoot them if they win the fight?

And dare I say… Do we want to write laws that err on the side of people attacking cops, or do we want laws that err on the side of cops being attacked?

What would it mean if the word was out: If you run at a cop with your fists up, he can’t shoot you…! He has to fight you! You can beat 'em down

This video on X, btw, actually shows the shooting.

I like how this person was a deputy police commissioner but just participates in this so casually, like she somehow thought there would just be no way she would get caught…

It’s one thing for an idiot hothead kid to do this, but imagine being 49 years old and having previously held a very respectable position that seemingly only an educated person would hold, and in law enforcement no less, and this is how you execute a crime, lol.

Also, it’s apparently a hit on a rival gang…?! lol

An indictment alleges Lackard helped plan a hit on a rival gang with her 20-year-old son, Chase Lackard. Both were charged with attempted murder.

MSN

Trump was on the outs with Epstein for a very long time and informed the FBI on him. But I am sure you were one of the dopes who was posting “There are 43,284 references to Trump in the Epstein files…!” but it’s literally just every email ever talking about politics.

The sexual abuse allegations concerning E. Jean Carroll were so absurd that Trump famously made a studio audience laugh uncontrollably while denying them, exposig the absurdity of it.

Terrific video from 2023 on YT.

It was a completely manufactured story - I really appreciate this walk down memory lane.

In the meantime I’ll continue ignoring the small time “journalism” you post regarding issues that aren’t even real issues because you desperately need to draw attention away from the failure criminal you’ve chosen to support.

Be my guest.

It’s a free country.

Let’s enjoy posting our own material for our own audiences, and I am more than happy to have a debate on the side here or there.

You have a series of conspiracy theories that are not incredibly indicting of Trump to back up the pedo claims and a civil court conviction only the most partisan hacks drag out to say he is a rapist…

It’s just not a strong case.

But more importantly: this whole thing can stand independently of Trump.

Approaching children to talk about sex and gender because you theorize that their true identities as madical third-gender Mermaids may never bloom is the definition of loony.

If that’s how you feel about Trump, I can’t wait to hear your opinion about the actual Islamists of Iran