• 0 Posts
  • 600 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle

  • That still doesn’t excuse the DDOS.

    And given how well he hid it, it’s obvious that he never intended that anyone see that list but him. That’s most of the ‘how dare he block so-and-so’ that I’ve seen; people mocking him for blocking them, yes, but they almost always tied it back to the fact that he was censoring the feeds of others without any kind of notification or opt-out for his users.

    Saying ‘here’s my blocklist; if you don’t like it, you can toggle it off, or find another frontend’ is curating, and that’s okay. But deciding what others get to see because ‘you know best’ and hiding that list of people and instances you blocked so no-one can find out what they’re not being allowed to see is censorship, and it’s not okay.





  • Ahem. From the article:

    This is what Hambrecht and Parsons are doing with their male-only gyms. They’re spreading conspiracies about morality and traditional marriage that cast women as dangerous. They’re promoting men rising up as warrior-kings who are ready to fight evil, and they’re getting rid of women who they claim are ruining everything.


  • Sorry. I tend to use Lemmy as another stand-in for fediverse, same as people say Kleenex for facial tissues.

    But you still seem to think this ban on interacting too much with people is a good thing, which I just can’t fathom.

    No-one can vote on a post more than once, and the votes are meaningless anyways. Plus, the more content and interactions, the better the fediverse is. So why stop people from voting to their heart’s content? The admin even flat-out said he thought too much interaction in the fediverse was a bad thing, which is like… that’s why we’re here? To interact with people?


  • Yes, but PugJesus hosted all his stuff on Pifed. That’s why he left; it was just too much to move.

    And again, if he was hitting it regularly, just a regular Lemmy content creator, that limit was way too fucking low.

    And again, since the limit is well-displayed, it’s not hard to get around it.

    So it’s fucking stupid.


  • Seleni@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldBadge of Honor
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No? Again, one account, one vote per comment. Each account votes once, on one person’s comment, isn’t going to trigger shit.

    If anything, making a ton of puppet accounts and having only some vote in rotation to push your agenda would be the best way to get around it. So it encourages a problem while claiming to fix a problem that isn’t there.

    Worse, it drives off the people who are on Lemmy a lot and make a lot of the content. That idiot admin just wants Lemmy to be silent, and he should just unplug his computer and go touch grass on a mountainside somewhere if he wants silence.



  • Right, and like he points out, as a frequent poster he often engages low-key with the people who comment on his posts with upvotes. So this really made it hard to engage for him.

    Regardless it’s a shit decision by the admin. Everyone on Lemmy gets one upvote/downvote per post they interact with. It’s not as if you can upvote or downvote a post multiple times (unless you go though multiple accounts, which that stupid rule wouldn’t fix anyways), so who cares if some people are upvoting or downvoting more than others? That just means they’re on Lemmy more, which is fine.

    So it’s a shit rule for something that isn’t a problem, and doesn’t address a possible adjacent problem (making lots of puppet accounts to push personal agendas) that could actually be an issue. That admin is just an idiot and an ass. I don’t blame Pug for leaving.





  • That’s because they have a bad case of tribalism. The capitalist is white, so in the same tribe. So they can’t be bad… right?

    I think Sir Terry Pratchett put it best:

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone’s fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I’m one of Us. I must be. I’ve certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We’re always one of Us. It’s Them that do the bad things.