• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle




  • While the dollar amount I suggested is particularly applicable to metro / high col areas, the concept still applies. The same expense/effort on behalf of the driver exists for a $30 delivery as with a $130 delivery.

    The same cannot be said for dine in.

    Flat rate for delivery, percentage based for dine in is a sensible solution which I didn’t come up with myself. More sensible of course is fair pay which negates tipping altogether but we aren’t there yet.

    If small town Indiana is a particularly low cost of living area then maybe $4 is a fair tip. But where I am from, $4 doesn’t last five seconds anymore.

    If it takes them 20 minutes to bring you your pizza, then go back to the shop, then at best they are making $12 per hour minus the mileage and gas and other expenses they incur driving their own vehicle… it’s a real shit job that can only be made better by decent tippers, until such a time comes that tipping is abolished (I won’t hold my breath).





  • I’ll put it this way… for dine in tipping, 20% is fine. If you order a cheap meal by yourself at a restaurant, that $4 tip on a $20 meal is fine. The server probably didn’t have to spend more than a few minutes with you.

    If you are a table of 5 with a bunch of drinks and a $200 tab, the server probably earned their 20% of $40.

    For delivery, a flat rate makes more sense. If someone delivers 3 pizzas and some wings for $100, did that take much more effort than delivering 1 pizza for $20? Same number of steps taken, miles driven, gas used, time used, etc.

    $8 to $10 makes sense for doorstep delivery in todays economy. $5 was fair pre-pandemic.

    If you are getting a whole bunch of stuff delivered then I can see justifying a bigger tip, but probably not percentage based.

    A $4 tip on delivery means the driver is taking a loss or maybe breaking even. They shouldn’t have to suffer because you had a small order.

    The service you receive for delivery is not as directly correlated with the total ticket amount as much as dine in might be.












  • The only thing that can correct bad science is good science.

    That’s the great thing about the scientific method, as soon as someone presents a flawed hypothesis which is then subjected to scrutiny, good science has the opportunity to shine a light on the mistakes.

    The process of science is not deeply flawed. Just because capitalism does indeed incentivize some to stray away from the scientific method does not then make science itself flawed.

    You are throwing the baby out with the bath water.

    Capitalism is a big problem, but to say that the scientific method is deeply flawed because of capitalism is not correct.