![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
My opinion is that if you obsess about trying to co-opt the concept of “diagnosis” so that you can have a word for yourself when you’re 0.1σ off the median, then that word exists, but it’s just “narcissist”.
My opinion is that if you obsess about trying to co-opt the concept of “diagnosis” so that you can have a word for yourself when you’re 0.1σ off the median, then that word exists, but it’s just “narcissist”.
Yeah when I showed the cop the graph of my speed before getting in my car to be 67000mph (speed of the earth around the sun) to 67080mphwhen I was driving it he couldn’t see the difference so I didn’t get the ticket.
Or sometimes choosing a common-sense reference makes sense.
Which isn’t to say THIS one does, it doesn’t, but the absolutism of “it’s nerf or nothing” is a tad extreme.
Academic Journals frantically spinning up botnets to retweet this
Now you know how I feel about Tutankhamun.
Yes, but I’d argue that capital has a more profound impact than “modern medicine”.
There is a massive MASSIVE selection pressure against reproduction for if you can afford kids or not.
You can look around the world and see countries with amazing health outcomes, beyond anything our ancestors even a few generations back could have dreamed of…
… And yet these countries no longer even have children at a replacement rate.
I’m not saying medicine isn’t a factor… Just saying that in terms of evolutionary pressure, capitalism is even greater a pressure.
(and mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother)
The sample size is at least a little bit bigger…
Some guy stole moon rocks (presumably still had moon dust on them) to bang his gf on them.
Can’t wait for chatGPT to start chastising people for asking a question it’s already heard before.
Adjective Noun Number.
Exactly… On EVERY point.
It’s almost a work of art how PERFECTLY they fucked up.
I mean, they bought the IP, fucked the original devs, didn’t actually create anything new, and clearly had absolutely no fucking clue why people liked KSP1.
This is just an example of some MBA idiots reach extending past their grasp.
They thought they could juice the IP like COD or GTA. They realized they had no fucking clue what was going on. They cut their losses.
If they even did KSP1 w/ multiplayer they’d have struck fucking diamonds. But that isn’t on the MBA bingo card. It isn’t skins, battle passes, and microtransactions.
Federal law states the punishment is a bare bottom spanking.
😳
They should just tag team the franchises w/ Obsidian.
They fucking CRUSHED it with NV.
It blows my fucking mind how badly companies mismanage good video game IP.
Either they absolutely saturate the market as fast as they can to the point where any game is just a grain of sand shifting and swirling as the waves of quarterly releases wash against the shore (Call of Duty)
Or they make a good game, but then spend either DECADES milking them (Elder Scrolls, GTA) or they just wait so long that it eventually falls of the cultural radar and the moment to strike is long past (Half Life, Portal)
Like, let creative people do creative things. Let people who are good at making games make games. No your MBA doesn’t mean you should be directing creative decisions.
Call the attorney general on me I’m calling the Ombudsman on you
I agree that condos do typically appreciate in value.
I think you’ll need to convince me that condo fees are fundamentally different than rental fees in a trailer park.
From my POV, it’s a fixed cost. The fees are used to fund maintaince on the greater whole of the housing system. A portion is used to fund the managing entity. If you fail to pay them, you will be legally removed. In your estimation, what is the practical difference?
My argument is that there are other more important factors that result in the relatively low demand (and this lack of upward pressure that results in property value appreciation), because I agree that condos do generally appreciate in value.
Can you think of ANY other reason that may contribute to the lack of upward pressure on trailer park dwelling values?
Mobile homes not appreciating isn’t strictly because of the conditions you described, though. You could say the same about a condo: you’re obligated to pay a monthly fee, if you don’t you can be removed, it isn’t mobile. In a sense it’s worse because of the possibility of a special assessment. But, condos often do appreciate in value.
Moments before what in retrospect was inevitable, Jeremy realized he shouldn’t have crammed his rectal cavity with cheddar cheese that morning.