

Anyone using ‘blood libel’ is clearly insane.


Anyone using ‘blood libel’ is clearly insane.


Cries of the Unborn (2017) with a spectacular 74% giving it a the lowest possible score on Letterboxd. 1.7/10 on IMDB. Based on the reviews it’s 12 Angry Men where 1 juror convinces the other 11 that it’s perfectly okay to kidnap someone as long as you’re preventing an abortion.


He randomly brought it up like 2 times, and none of them were this week. He’s already forgotten about it.


So they’re destroying the ‘social’ feature of their social media. Interesting choice.


Because the non-human animals are irrelevant. Christianity is centered around the idea that humans are above nature.
Which Michigan are you from?


Beauty and the Beast (1991) contains TWO wolf attack scenes. Are you telling me that Disney didn’t research nature correctly?
Just an idea but maybe remove tariffs on food?
I demand films that show a realistic amount of traffic, even when traffic is completely unrelated to the story.


Mountain lions kill almost nobody.


Is it possible the political divide in this country is people with lead poisoning vs. those without it?


Equally pointless as reading fiction in general, playing a video game, or daydreaming.


Looks fake. This guy is known for spreading propaganda.


False equivalency. Not ending wars fast enough is not the same thing as Trump literally starting a war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_United_States_troops_from_Afghanistan_(2011–2016)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_United_States_troops_from_Iraq_(2007–2011)
Where is the page about Trump announcing a withdrawal from Iran? When that page exists, maybe then you can call them equivalent. Until then, it’s a bad faith argument.


Feels like a bad faith argument. Obama probably shouldn’t have won a peace prize, most people agree with that. But he was not responsible for Iraq and Afghanistan the way that Trump directly caused the current conflict. While he continues to lie about it in the news every day.


Ah yes, the president will be behind a paywall. Democracy.


Ending a war, even one that he himself began, is still something that’s potentially “peace prize eligible.” I’m willing to give him a pat on the back if he actually does something right. He won’t though.


“They have a reputation for maybe not giving it to people like me.”
You mean people actively involved in war? Yeah. If you stopped the war tomorrow maybe you’d be eligible.
They appeased him before, so he keeps asking for more.