We should expand any and all safety nets for children when it comes to care and food. Children in America are living in impoverished homes at a growing rate and in some cases may only eat while at school/daycare. While the problems and circumstances to why they are in these situations are numerous, no child should ever have a plate confiscated in place of a sub par snack in comparison.
Out of curiosity, and I don’t mean this pointedly. Have you ever purchased property? The assessment of appraisal doesn’t matter one way or another. You could easily be above or below it. It’s a fair market value, much like the Kelly bluebook for cars if you’re in the states (I’m uncertain if that’s a U.S. only assessor or not.) it’s a fair value of what the asset should be not the end all be all. Of course it’s the basis for taxes which is super relevant to your argument, I understand and appreciate that, but for much else it doesn’t matter.
Now let me start by stating, I think I understand where your points are. Please allow me to express the issues that I have with them and why these situations are different.
So, Jon Stewart sold his building for an obscene amount over the appraised value. There is a discrepancy among the assessed value, I see that as well. Most appraisal districts go off of a value for proposed areas plus other things like additional structures, refining of current structures (new roof, new windows, paved driveway, etc.) most offices ronco the absolute hell out of these appraisals for years. More often than not within city limits to do any of these things you have to pull permits. Pull enough of them and your house gets reappraised. This is important because the housing market will vary wildly. And yes, I’m aware that they will adjust property values yearly but they only fluctuate based on the current housing market. My guess would be (outside of money laundering that I stated earlier. I never argued the fact that it wasnt ridiculous, just that they aren’t the same.) that there has been several renovations done or a gentrification (or planned) of the neighborhood. We could speculate why it would be so high over the appraised value and I’m uncertain why there would be all the hullabaloo with reporting on it without any investigation. But I digress, selling something to someone who would have a chance to inspect the property, walk it themselves even, so they know what they are purchasing is far and away different from lying about asset values and even lying about the assets themselves to obtain better loans is fraud. On top of this there is so much about it being a victimless crime, money isn’t infinite, not without hyper inflation. Banks can’t just give endless loans. If this is a widespread practice, it takes away from the working class that try to secure loans for literally anything.
But again, the buyer who way overpaid got to go through the ringer when buying the property. The bank could have been up a creek if he didn’t pay. What happens when banks go up a creek? They get government bail outs that we have to pay for.
Again, you are conflating the notion that someone who sold items privately on an agreed upon private basis is the same for someone who literally lied about what the asset values they had in their possession to trick banks into offering different better loans.
You fail to see the significant crime because you seem to be hung up on the potential tax difference (of which John Stewart would have paid at the end of the year anyways due to capital gains tax) that these two are paying.
Let’s not sit here and pretend that someone who sold something over valued is anywhere near the same as someone lying about not only the value of the asset but of the assets themselves. I’m failing to see where or how you are drawing these lines as the idea of this post and your stance seems either ignorant or nonsensical. Just because the appraisal district is off by a sizeable margin doesn’t mean that it’s some weird conspiracy for the “witch hunt” of Donald Trump. If anything -again- that sticks out about this is some sort of money laundering scheme.
But the far right suddenly loves the new york times and are deeply incapable of determining the difference between two completely separate instances and trying to conflate the two together.
Just so I’m perfectly clear on what you’re saying. You’re trying to tell me that a man who lied about the square footage and the overall assumed market value of his assets to show to lenders that he had overstated his assets for lower interest rates and wider availability of loans from investing companies is the same to someone who sold their building as an absolute premium? The better conspiracy theory argument would have been to say that John Stewart was laundering money.
Again, the free market is the free market. People will pay what they feel the asset is worth. If this guy got suckered into paying such a premium that’s a him problem. Overstating your assets for lower interest rates and wider availability of funds is fraud. He was just found guilty of it…
Leave it to Tim Pool to completely miss the mark. The issue with Trump’s fraud case differs from this wildly. Trump inflates the assessed market value for an increased capital value to bolster collateral for loans. John Stewart put a giant sticker price on a building and some sucker bought it. Crazy thing about the free market, you can sell a shit sandwich for whatever someone will buy it for. Look at apple products.
Did they really not use the tag line, “he will huff, he will puff, he will snort blow until your house falls down.”?