![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://hilariouschaos.com/pictrs/image/7c1b037a-94f5-47bc-b1c4-afd6cb768ac2.webp)
But apparently, not the bodies.
But apparently, not the bodies.
(article is from beginning of May)
He’s suggesting balancing the content. If all you read is terrible, outrage inducing news, yes, you’re life is far worse off. It’s outside our your sphere of influence and reading the same news for the third time won’t make you more informed.
The only thing it will do is make you feel angry, helpless, and less understanding of nuance. Keep it going for longer enough and, congratulations, you’ve radicalized yourself.
Not all algorithms are AI
Hmm, let’s see… Yeah, that’d be okay.
You really had no idea where the swastika came from, did you?
You also don’t understand the purpose of the satanic church.
According to Christians, not Satanists
Streisand effect anyone?
This just feels like those kids who never learn to tie their shoelaces and then say they leave them loose on purpose because it’s cooler.
Works perfectly fine for me, but it’s probably the redirect from co.uk to com.
I read it, but there’s no way of telling how many OGs are still involved, they’re just talking about the studio as a whole.
The developers behind Fable card game spin-off Fable Fortune
A bit of a stretch to call them Fable devs…
That sounds like a weird argument, these billion-dollar companies know exactly what goes into their models. Give me a reason they wouldn’t be able to disclose this if they were compelled.
Because you, as a business owner, took that risk. Mortgage could have gone down too. It’s not the renter’s problem nor fault.
Less than 2% of video games feature LGBTQ+ content.
Playing devil’s advocate for a second, how many games feature straight content and confirmed straight characters? I know it’s more than LGBTQ, but the 2% number should be taken relative to that at least if you want a fairer comparison. A lot of games don’t deal with sexuality or romantic relationships at all.
I’m all for representation, but the less than 2% number is misleading for the point it’s trying to make.
Lots of nominative determinism in this thread.
I understand, but keep in mind it could be an innocent user whose phone is taken over by malware, better be safe than sorry.