Judging from the map provided in the article, it looks like a drone operator was aiming for Ukraine and either went long, or went short (depending whether they launched from Russia or Belarus).
Seems to be an “attack” caused by Russian incompetence.
Ge always wanted the end of Democracy. Claiming it was incompatible with freedom.
Posh girl kills herself, family and courts read her personal diaries in order to blame veganism.
An intentional corruption of the election processes.
The answer is always billionaires and corrupt grifters.
I think that’s the point, right?
Option 1): AI is genetically enabling gay couples to become “pregnant” by match a surrogates DNA to their partners in order to find their perfect “Gayby” offspring. Allowing gay men to produce a baby with similar genes to their loved one.
Option 2): AI companies are now helping newly transitioned women to have their genes spliced with womb donors, in order to further research into male-born pregnancy. The first baby conceived by two people of male DNA is espected happen to within the next two years, with doctors confident of current results.
Option 3): Men without families are now being targeted by an extremely addictive AI app. The app named Family Now is giving men the customized experience of having a wife, and even a child who looks like them, however some who play the game have reported feeling manipulated and addicted to it.
The dominion voting machine company was bought by a Republican business man. It’s now called “Liberty Vote”. Those machines are used in more than half the states, and their counting function which is used to count votes gets “calibrated” before the count. That calibration (eg. What sample cards return votes for what parties) determines who wins.
At the same time, security researchers, federal advisories and election experts have documented software vulnerabilities and real-world procedural failures that could be exploited if safeguards and chain-of-custody practices break down
Most election‑security experts highlighted to journalists and in formal letters that the riskiest failures are procedural: poor chain-of-custody, lax physical security, careless software updates and insider actions
Anyways I’m sure Trump isn’t capable of breaking down safeguards \s
…it’s because of all the colonising and stealing of words.
Funny in the same way as when normie Americans talking about the 2028 election like they still have a democracy.
Trump’s built a bunker and people still refuse to face the fact that they’re at the “watering the tree of liberty” phase and have been for years.
I hope there was a dolphin painted in the back of his mind.
“Some things you don’t forget, I’ll tell you whut”
Weird that they have matching outfits.
Dumb ass you’re on my thread, you’re replying to my comment (the downvoted one)… So no I’ve not got any flak for putting words in your mouth…
YOU asked about “how will we get new models!!” That was your concern, not me putting words in your mouth …your exact words were:
“How would you make better models then?”
Another slop brained AI idiot, worried about the wrong things in life.
Phones and social media giving everyone cancer!
When talking about the eye you need to actually know what you’re suggesting an improvement to:
The Composition Stage - and “the gesture” of your drawing.
Part of a stumbling block for drawing at the level we’re on (yes I’m stuck here to) - is we’re still not spending any effort on penciling in the gesture, the perspective, the composition - THEN drawing over it.
You and I are still “drawing to copy” and producing scratchy art by duplication of what we see, rather than working on gesture and composition to convey something.
P.S If you ever want to do digital art, can recommend a cheap passive capacity stylus (under $10 on Aliexpress, works on all mobile digital devices) and infinite painter or krita which are free.
Trump… Who started all this. You know what - he should distract by reinstituting global tarrifs, because that was smart \s
Turns out corruption and increasing the wealth gap is… Bad for the economy?
Yes technically “but a corrupt government just wouldn’t do it” can knock down all suggestions and is the ultimate argument for reenforcing total apathy… If that’s your aim.
Also, don’t bother responding, because an even more corrupt government would just censor free speech online, so no point you saying anything back. See it’s the ultimate apathy.
Hence “if we could outlaw the training of new models” - but I suppose if you love new models that much, you could limit their training to educational institutions who have to propose new models via an ethics boards before training them - much like is done with medical experimentation.
P.S hahaha I’m getting down votes for saying to outlaw the training of new models, you’re getting upvotes for saying “but how will I get new models?”. What sub even is this?
Especially as it was a single drone.
If they do more from here my mind might change, but looks like an operator overshot in some way.