that’s exactly what this article is.

the article makes it sound like the chinese government is cracking down on queers by getting rid of grindr when the reality is that the american government forced the chinese to sell their ownership of grindr and chinese queers prefer to use grindr alternatives anyways.

it’s interesting how you conflate 2 things that are barely related to each other, in this case:

1. you’re not talking to queers in china; but are pretending that you are to double down on your beliefs.
2. the american government has repeatedly admitted publically that it run propaganda factories throughout the world and especially in china.

i guess i can see how you get the 2 thing confused with one another since they’re tangentially related to china and i would too if i too refused to do some light reading to educate myself about the world.

you’re not talking to any queers in china; the cia has spies everywhere; and you’re changing the subject again.

you’re not talking to anyone and the real funny part is that my gov’t has admitted several times publicly that they do this, but people like you still believe it’s a conspiracy theory.

the problem is that you’re not talking to them; you’re taking in a propagandized version of them that are getting paid to say those things.

you’re conflating your expectations with reality. this article is propaganda, the chinese queer community feels like they’re on their own and expect discrimination to come from their peers rather than their government and you would know this if you really were on rednote.

no, you’re the one trying to paint it queer advancement as foreign influence while this article is clearly pink washing.

not only have you not backed up your assertions, you keep on changing the topic; so it’s become clear that you don’t have anything to offer on the topic other than echoing propaganda.

yes, it does help and it’s not me whose doing it; it’s an established fact that the american congress has publically admitted to doing many times in the past and to many countries across the world; most notably in north korea

try to show pro-LGBTQ stuff in similar light to you, some foreign influence operation.

this describes western propaganda and there’s no history of this; but you insist that it has something to do with the chinese government.

sources that are not part of the US state department are needed to verify it.

are you going to share the decryption key for this ultra cryptic message? lol

i talk to chinese queers everyday via rednote and can attest that gay discrimination is definitely a thing in china; but it comes from its people and not the government.

this is pink washing because it meant to make americans believe that the government is doing the discriminating and there’s no clearer sign of this than a source that has been caught red handed peddling propaganda in the past as well as selective talking point that focuses grindr when other grindr-like platforms are used in china, but completely ignored by this piece of propaganda.

you would do well to develop some media literacy so that you won’t be brainwashed by future propaganda.

it’s the only thing there is since you won’t won’t provide any evidence to back up your claim and you’re bought into pink washing propaganda from a source that has a history of peddling propaganda.

it’s an assertion that makes sense given that you accepted this pinkwashing propaganda at face value and tried to defend it; anyone that you associate with will have a similar disposition since birds of a feather flock together.

the normal people i know privately say the opposite and they’re heavily politically engaged; they would know more than your people from that alone.

a very real possibility; which is why i want your sources.

the only thing to be sorry about is your avoidance of the question; you’re the one who’s not responding with evidence to support your assertion.

i’m seeking it because i’m already an online member of the chinese queer community and i never heard your sentiment shared; if it exists, i want to know about it.

my bet would be american kompromat.

that sounds unhinged.

is this hostile state attention in the room with us? lol

i’m asking you to back up your assertion by sharing the people who are already sharing themselves on rednote; so there’s no doxxing application here.

i’m a queer on rednote and its algorithms show me queer content and creators and i have yet to see one echo a sentiment that matches your assertion.