I said League, and it has to be one that unlocked all the skins.

Still cheaper than a mac

What version of lawnchair are you using? I have app folders (although its a bit clunky to manage in the UI, they do exist). Still missing tabs though.

“Let’s see, here is a fine of 7 million dollars, please pay to this account that tax payers will never see a dime from.”

Its a great skill to have, if you fix something a bit janky, no one is going to notice.

Getting a basic sewing machine, while absolutely not required, opens the door to more efficient repairs or modifications. Like shortening sleeves or pants that are too long. (You also don’t have to learn to do different stitches, you select one on the machine and let it do the hard part)

The main thing for me, it gets google out of the picture. No AI, no google search bar, etc.

It also allows me to manage apps in the app drawer. I can hide any stock apps, and put less commonly uses apps in to folders (I miss tabs on Nova). Instead of scrolling through pages of home screen, I swipe up and can see all my common apps at once, no scrolling. The home screen now has free space for widgets.

Meanwhile Dad’s call the channel locks a “wrench”, the pliers a “wrench”, the adjustable wrench a “crescent wrench”, the socket wrench a “wrench” and the 10mm wrench “cheap piece of shit”.

Place of Origin: United Kingdom

Yeah, that checks out

It won’t be direct government advertising, it’ll be whatever mega-corp they outsource this to that refuses to make sure the ads are scam free and sfw.

Also expect 100% up time for the ad service, but the breaths may range 0 to 15 per minute depending on how many people are using the service at once.

this device is designed to be your secondary smartphone

In this economy?

I hope it’s a skirt, or some form of “technically not a dress” that only computer chair experts woud argue about.

While I have no doubt this could have happened, fuck ICE, I do seek more evidence than a picture with a bold claim. When the first commenter asked for evidence, the links went to a site had the same picture and caption with no additional information. Showing that the picture and caption are circulating the internet does nothing to aid its credibility.

The caption could make anything up, right media might spin it and say something like “extremest interferes with federal operation resulting in arrest”. Same picture, 2 opposite stories.

It’s like posting a picture of an old man alone in front a birthday cake and the caption reading “so sad none of his family showed to the party”, meanwhile all the family is just out of frame.

In the age of for-profit-media, it’s difficult to filter out what is true and what is false or exaggerated for rage clicks. When bold claims are presented to us, we need to do the best we can to verify our source is presenting them to us in good faith.

Edit I see the Getty link was shared after my original comment, and I didn’t see until after typing this one out. My first reaction is wow, the photographer is selling these? - photos of people getting arrested and harassed, possibly the worst moments of their life sold for profit. My second reaction is, these photos are visually very nice, and more important, it’s probably dangerous to get that close, so if you wanna make money doing that - you do you bro.

Yeah, I’m with you on this one. Even the linked sources don’t have anything, its just a picture with a caption.

“It’s a Christmas miracle he survived!”

“Summarize this email” Run and don’t look back.

Better than high heels

That’s why people go jogging at 2am.