… How? My Tubular won’t open peertube links, and i have tagged all the extra links it offered in open by default

So…in theory a state could ban all its constituents from voting for presidency?

It forbids them from ever voting again though.

Wow thanks! Let me take a look, I missed the portainer part! Sigh…I followed through the instructions. I deleted the previous stack, and created a new one, this time all the way from portainer. This time I ONLY modified the .env file, well and according to the instructions the .yaml referring to the .env as stack.env now. Made it deploy…and nothing. Still getting the same mkdir error :(

Thanks…I did follow their guide, step by step. The only thing that I customized was the immich uploads folder, which I want it to go to my NAS. I have it set up on an NFS mount handled by proxmox, and then it’s just a transparent bind mount in the LXC. The user in the lxc container has read/write access to this location, and docker runs on this same user. But I reckon I’m addressing this in docker in a horribly messed way, as I’ve never used it before. Checking the docker logs immich_server, I’m getting this:

[Nest] 7  - 04/08/2024, 9:53:08 AM     LOG [SystemConfigService] LogLevel=log (set via system config)
node:fs:1380
  const result = binding.mkdir(
                         ^

Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir 'upload/library'
    at mkdirSync (node:fs:1380:26)
    at StorageRepository.mkdirSync (/usr/src/app/dist/repositories/storage.repository.js:112:37)
    at StorageService.init (/usr/src/app/dist/services/storage.service.js:30:32)
    at ApiService.init (/usr/src/app/dist/services/api.service.js:72:29)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at async ApiModule.onModuleInit (/usr/src/app/dist/app.module.js:58:9)
    at async callModuleInitHook (/usr/src/app/node_modules/@nestjs/core/hooks/on-module-init.hook.js:51:9)
    at async NestApplication.callInitHook (/usr/src/app/node_modules/@nestjs/core/nest-application-context.js:223:13)
    at async NestApplication.init (/usr/src/app/node_modules/@nestjs/core/nest-application.js:100:9)
    at async NestApplication.listen (/usr/src/app/node_modules/@nestjs/core/nest-application.js:169:33) {
  errno: -13,
  code: 'EACCES',
  syscall: 'mkdir',
  path: 'upload/library'

Let’s see… So let’s say my LXC container has a /mnt/NAS-immich-folder path, already mounted and with rw permissions. Then I edited my docker-compose.yml volumes line as follows:

    volumes:
      - /mnt/NAS-immich-folder:/mnt/immich
      - ${UPLOAD_LOCATION}:/mnt/immich
      - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro

And my .env path looks like:

# The location where your uploaded files are stored
UPLOAD_LOCATION=/media/immich

…I’m sure I’m doing something horribly wrong besides the no-no of docker over LXC…Is there anything messed in these paths? What am I doing wrong? Thanks so much!

Thanks! When I type my LXC’s IP:2283, I get unable to connect. I checked the docker-compose.yml and the port seems to be 2283:3001, but no luck at either. Is there anything that needs to be done on docker’s network in order to…“publish” a container to the local network so it can be seen? Or any docker running with a port can be reached via the host’s IP with no further config? Checking the portainer’s networks section, I can see an ‘immich-default’ network using bridge on 172.18.0.0/16, while the system’s bridge seems to be running at 172.17.0.0/16. Is this the correct defaults? Should I change anything?

Thanks!

Sure…But proxmox is already there. It’s installed and it runs 5VMs and about 10 containers. …I’m not going to dump all that just because I need docker…and I’m not getting another machine if I can get use that. So…sure, there might be overhead, but I saw some other people doing it, and the other alternative I saw was running docker on a VM…which is even more overhead. And I fear running it on the proxmox server bare metal, it might conflict with how it manages the LXC containers.

Yes. I changed and didn’t look back.

While that sounds nice and all, I’ve had playback issues before…not to mention it’s bulkier than a chromecast, and I’d still need a remote…There’s no Android or Android-TV solution that’s privacy friendly right?

Ok…I have an old chromecast that I use when I travel to connect to my jellyfin server. It’s already giving me crap in the home screen for movies and series on platforms I don’t even have. What would be a cheap and portable device I could use when I travel so I can hook to any TV?

Thanks!

Would be great if they also countered Google’s dark patterns in the notification bar toggles and revert back to the old working design. I’m not saying it’s even close to the same priority as this. But you know… Google’s decisions are downgrading the platform and the experience.

If they keep doing it is because it keeps working