![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/dbeda0de-d3fb-4fab-8703-3e52e72cb4db.jpeg)
So don’t read the article. And maybe quit policing other people’s conversations
So don’t read the article. And maybe quit policing other people’s conversations
I wish more people in general would be OK with being wrong. Noone ever learned something new without knowing they’d been wrong
He was much better written in those games, I think
I enjoyed Brannagh’s much ado about nothing. I rather enjoyed Mel Gibson Hamlet. Both seem very fresh and contemporary to me
Bullshit. Utter bullshit. There are and always have been topics that are not socially acceptable. That’s not PC gone mad, that’s being a functioning human being in a society
Umm… What?
It’s always avoidable. It’s also still quite possible
The Dutch have been working on this for ages : https://lightyear.one/
As a philosophy grad, I appreciate this =) But philosophy gained a heap from Science too (probably more than v…v.) , so it’s all good. It strikes me as natural that Science will time to time have to engage in Philosophy when it considers its assumptions.
All food or just some food? I’d agree with the latter but not the former
I don’t think it’s the platform so much, I think there’s an inevitability about communication quality dropping as audience size increases
Yeah, there are a few things I can’t discuss. I was trying to discuss antisemitism with a group of Jewish people and that was clearly a discussion where there was no point even conversing. Merely asking for information was too much. It’s a shame because I’ve learned a lot from various groups who have expanded my world view by sharing their understanding with me. But ultimately I think any area of discussion can end up being painful and pointless if the people you’re conversing with have immovable beliefs - climate change, identity politics, socialism /capitalism are all possible tar-pits
Not duplicate myself
Film and theatre are areas that have been and still are rife with abuse. I don’t really want to hear from someone who isnt a vulnerable individual about what we should do to protect vulnerable individuals
You could argue that embeddings constitute some kind of stored knowledge. But I do agree with your larger point, LLMs are getting to much credit because of the language we use to describe them
You’re entitled to your wrong opinion.
Yes and I was right. Thanks for agreeing
Talk about a. Gets response to a. Responds about B. Gets upset when it’s pointed out that a is not B. Crows about being proven right. Whatever
Well enjoy talking to yourself then
Look in the mirror