• 6 Posts
  • 285 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2025

help-circle
  • rahOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldGNOME Foundation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Does the Gitlab -> GitHub redirect also long predate the rise in AI scrapers?

    Nobody from GNOME has linked the Gitlab -> GitHub redirect to the rise in AI scrapers.

    If you haven’t been staying up to date, maybe do that before dismissing explanations?

    I surely would were you only to provide references to sources backing up your claims.





  • rahOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldGNOME Foundation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    it is obviously sensible to assume

    I disagree. There’s no need to make assumptions. And even if there were, this does not seem like a sensible assumption to make given that the GNOME Foundation’s financial woes long predate the rise in AI scrapers.


  • rahOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldGNOME Foundation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s not GNOME-specific. klangcola@reddthat.com is saying GNOME have experienced “massively increased hosting costs” but there’s no mention of increased hosting costs in the article I linked to, massive or otherwise, and as far as I know, nobody has mentioned any increase in the context of GNOME, hence my question.



  • rahOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldGNOME Foundation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    It’s really, really, really bad reportage. 90% of what they post is just rewording emails from mailing lists with nothing added at all. They’re just regurgitating words they don’t understand.

    They focus a lot on drama and it’s like a twelve year old decided to write about all the most superficial drama without any technical understanding of what they’re writing about.

    Their “benchmarks” have been heavily criticised too and it’s clear they basically have no idea what they’re doing and the numbers aren’t to be trusted.

    Their English prose is terrible. “For this …” wut?

    All in all, just a sorry excuse for a website. If it were a newspaper, the appropriate term for it would be a “rag”.













  • rahtohomeassistant@lemmy.worldHome Assistant 2026.3: A clean sweep
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’d say they are focussed on making well engineered software over making money.

    I think you must have a different idea of what “well engineered software” means because to me, nothing you’ve said implies a focus on making well engineered software.

    Writing software without remuneration doesn’t imply a focus on well engineered software. A person can write software without remuneration with a focus on anything, not necessarily good engineering. For example, one can write software without remuneration with a focus on financial reward in future. Which is exactly what appears to have happened. Working without pay to build a business with the expectation that the business will be profitable in future doesn’t imply that the business will be built on good engineering.

    Helping secure remote access for those who don’t know how to do it themselves doesn’t imply a focus on well engineered software. Educating people isn’t the same thing as engineering software, let alone engineering software well. Ease of use isn’t the same thing as good engineering; one can engineer easy to use software well and one can engineer easy to use software poorly. Nabu Casa Inc. have done the latter.