Sounds cool, thanks for the explanation!

Catbox links have never worked for me on android for some reason

My group plays pretty loose goosy with the rules. We just look at it and make a quick estimate of whether something looks in range. They also have little range finder tools that are helpful for quickly determine cones, spheres, etc. We’re also the kind of party that doesn’t really keep track of gold. Apparently gold has a weight?

For this reason I actually don’t like playing one shots with people I don’t know, because they don’t play by all of our house rules, lol.

“anonymized” sure. I highly doubt they read every message. I’m sure there is lots of de-anonymizing information in the messages themselves

For example–

Anon1: “hey jeff, wanna play Minecraft?”

Anon2: “sure”

Thus we know Anon2’s name is Jeff. I imagine there’s a lot of this.

Great so I can see the highlight of the video and then close out before the ad?

Yeah it’s honestly way more likely for someone to change the file type and break the file while renaming it, than it is for malware to get past Defender.

Isn’t that kinda dangerous? Also potentially illegal depending on where you live.

Idk if installing a gas range DIY is actually dull. Seems kinda cool to me.

This is my first time reading about this. I’m very curious to hear a lawyer’s thoughts on this.

If you change the bootloader to some other software, how could the company be expected to provide support for something they may have no knowledge of? Suppose I develop some theoretical SnowsuitOS and then complain to Samsung support when it doesnt run on my smartphone? It seems very likely that some conflict in my code could be causing problems, as opposed to an issue with my hardware.

I feel like to require this, you’d have to prove that the software is functionally equivalent to their software, right? (Side note, isn’t this problem undecidable? Program equivalence?)

If you replace a wheel on a tractor you can pretty easily define what it should and should not do. Determining equivalence seems simpler with a physical situation. On the other hand, I’m pretty sure program equivalence is not a solved problem.

My point here is that I don’t think it’s reasonable to legally require a software company to offer support without limits, because they cannot be sure that there is not an issue with the (unsupported) software you are using.

They’re part of Department of Homeland Security. NSA is part of Department of Defense. So they’re actually not, unless you meant this figuratively.

I’m guessing this is primarily driven by what crops grow in those areas.

I mean, it IS freely available. I’m pretty sure many (all?) of these paid apps get their data from NOAA and NWS.

I thought about changing the headers for our tests to avoid this, but honestly if someone is doing that I’m not very concerned about them, lol.

I use gimp but OP isn’t wrong. Doing a stroke on text is mindless in Photoshop and very convoluted in gimp.

Ah, the old HH:mm:ss:MM:dd:yyyy

Rep*blican