• 161 Posts
  • 1.4K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 11th, 2024

help-circle






  • Free speech doesn’t let you say whatever you want to anyone, it’s intention is to protect you while speaking out against government officials and offices.

    It sounds like you’re getting freedom of speech mixed up with the First Amendment. They aren’t the same thing. The First Amendment’s intention is to protect your freedom of speech from the government. If you want your freedom of speech protected from other things (such as your employer), the First Amendment won’t protect you.


  • No, the First Amendment only protects you from the government. “Free speech” is a philosophical principle which has nothing to do with governments directly.

    However, an “advertising standards board” that decides what can and cannot be posted publicly sounds pretty governmental to me.

    But even when free speech wasn’t forced it wouldn’t force channels to carry your advertisement.

    Of course, but that still isn’t any kind of universal standards board, that’s individual channels deciding independently.





  • It was also posted on MSN, so you can avoid the WSJ paywall.

    It’s clickbaity. The conclusion is pretty unexciting: for most people, all you need to do is drink water with food and when you get thirsty. Maybe this will help somebody who’s over-obsessed with getting enough water, and it’s impacting their quality of life? It really feels like they couldn’t find anything good to write about, so they had to dredge this up.

    NB: the conclusion includes this:

    One caveat: Some researchers warn thirst can be delayed or reduced with age or certain medications.

    Age or certain medications or certain medical conditions. I have ADHD, so I legit won’t get thirsty 95% of the time. I have to have something to remind me to drink.





  • I think that almost anybody can become proficient, but talent is something innate. We aren’t just blank slates. We are naturally better at some things than others. There have been numerous examples of prodigies who showed amazing skill at a very young age, despite having relatively little practice. For example, Mozart was taught how to play piano from the age of four and was able to compose pieces at the age of five. Many parents have tried to get their small children to play musical instruments from a very young age, but most of them have not been able to produce new Mozarts. Of course, Mozart and other prodigies practiced a lot, too, but others who practiced just as much, if not more, got nowhere close to their skill level.

    Now, the reason I said almost anybody is because it makes sense to me that if there are people who are talented, then there must be the opposite, people who have anti-talent. There are people who are so tone-deaf that they’ll never make good music, not even if they practice every chance they get. However, talent and anti-talent are at the ends of the bell curve: most people are somewhere in the middle, and if they practice enough, they can make something which is adequate, if not good…and, occasionally, even something great.