It’s already not bad for certain specific, niche applications. Check out PlantNet. It’s awesome. You can take a picture of a plant, and it’ll identify it for you. No micro-transactions; you don’t even have to log in. It just works.
Obviously, that isn’t one of the applications of Machine Learning that people have a problem with. It’s the LLMs filtering out your resume or spying on you or producing slop.
Yeah, this article is promoting the doomsday AI myth which is the narrative that these companies want us to go with, because it makes their products seem powerful. In reality, people are already turning against this technology en masse — not because they’re afraid it’ll turn into Skynet, but because it sucks shit.
I’m not taking character assessments from somebody who complains about downvotes lmao
How does it imply that?
They have a department called “human resources”. Come on. They see humans as just another resource.
Sounds like body dysphoria. Have you considered that you might be trans?
It also primes them to accept surveillance in adulthood. If you grew up with your parents spying on you, then you won’t mind as much when your boss (or government!) spies on you.
You’re delusional if you think plan A has a chance of working on someone like Fetterman.
You’re the one who brought up Fetterman. If you want to run against him, go for it.
Most of our politicians are beholden to big money, not the people.
Okay, so then they can be replaced. Which part of what I said do you disagree with? If people can’t be bothered to make calls, then they sure as fuck can’t run a campaign. Because guess what you do in a campaign? A lot of fucking phone calls!
Voting them out is Plan B. Plan A is lobbying them (e.g. calls, emails) because it’s so much easier than Plan B. Sure, if they keep ignoring you, by all means, vote their asses out, but that is a task that is so much bigger than simply calling their office.
Call your representatives. Or email them.
Seems like the money is at its back so its going to happen,
Well, there’s certainly a lot of money being spent to make you believe this. I’m not buying it. Every day, dislike of AI grows. Meanwhile, AI companies still aren’t turning a profit. If the AI companies win, they’ll be in control of a public utility that many businesses will need to survive.
don’t understand why the atheist isn’t doing drugs and having rampant sex,
I would argue that you can do both of those things and still be morally right as long as it’s all safe and consenting.
I think that Christians over-estimate how morally bankrupt they would be without Christianity, because they believe that every human is the worst without Jesus. At least that’s what they tell me.
Atheists use whatever their morality tells them they should do. There’s a complex interplay of empathy, conscience, whatever moral codes they’ve picked up from their family, their education, and/or society at large. Hopefully, it’s all informed by logic and reason, but just like everything else we do it’s driven by emotion.
Quite a bit more than mildly infuriating.
Oh, they provide sources. At least, some of them do. It’s just that the sources don’t always back them up. It’s going to gin up sources whether it’s correct or not, because that’s what it’s programmed to do.
That isn’t the point. Why are you asking the question in the first place? If you don’t care whether the answer is true or not, you could just make up your own answer and save yourself some typing.
This is the argument that cigarette companies used for a long time to avoid accountability. It wasn’t the fault of the cigarettes. It’s all those contributing factors.
I saw a lot of that during lockdown. “She didn’t die from COVID! She died of pneumonia!” Wow, a lot of people are dying from pneumonia this year! That isn’t normal, is it?
Real grifters.