That would be terrible. We already have a problem with people vandalizing Satanic monuments and displays.

Also, that would open the door to make any kind of vandalism legal.

Yeah, everybody knows you play “Thunder” during sex. Sheesh!

When you get right down to it, that’s true for everything. Everything self-destructs eventually. So, that seems like a strange reason to destroy it prematurely.

Of course, if it’s your book, you can do whatever you want with it. It just seems needlessly wasteful.

The Sexual Politics of Meat.

Que? Que, amigo?

Yeah, the danger of a Democratic president is the left growing complacent again, allowing the right to fester and come up with another dictator.

Nonono, it’s “ra*ist”. The * could be either a P or a C.

They keep doing shady shit. I was a Brave defender until I read all of that. At the end of the day, there is no shortage is Chromium browsers, so I might as well use one that doesn’t have this sketchy history. Like Ungoogled Chromium.

Returded? What is that, like you take a shit so hard it ricochets and goes back up your butt?

You’re kinda proving my point. The reason why you don’t see it as kinky is because it’s so common. If it wasn’t common and normalized, people would see it as a kink. I’m kink-positive; I don’t have a problem with that. What I find interesting is how accepted and ubiquitous this one kink has become, and I think we have porn to thank for that.

It’s not really a modern thing as such either. The kama sutra features a ton of it, including gay and lesbian versions.

Well, that isn’t really surprising. I think you would have a really hard… er, difficult time finding a new kink. People have been horny for as long as there have been people, and every imaginable configuration has been tried out thousands of years ago. Except for vibrators or any of the other modern sex toys? Because those didn’t exist before.

Oh, so this is a rant against Lemmy generally, not the person you were responding to. It would help if you made that clear at the start.

I am both atheist and religious BTW (Satanist), so some of those types get under my skin, too.

Read the OP.

it seems to thinks googling ‘“shemale”, “tranny”, “femboy”, and “ladyboy”’’ counts as searching for trans porn.

What do you think they’re searching for? Scholarly dissertations? Recipes?

Yeah, I’ve seen this pointed out before. They say that trans women are men, but they don’t treat them like men. They treat them like women.

This reminds me of a friend of mine whose trans daughter attending elementary school had a bully calling her a “boy” and then chasing her around and trying to kiss her. Really, kid? Do you like to kiss boys now? Obviously, sexual harassment isn’t cool at any age, and that needs to be dealt with, but it just goes to show that even at that young age deep down they know the difference.

Isn’t the Scunthorpe Problem when something gets unintentionally blocked? This seems very intentional.

Millions of people might be watching a video, that doesn’t mean that millions believe it.

The really crazy one is oral sex. It’s become so accepted and ubiquitous that if you don’t like it, you’re the weird one. But if you stop to think about it, it’s clearly a kink.

They didn’t forget femboys. They lumped them in with trans (even though they aren’t).

Oh and let’s not forget, all religion is bad and evil and hates sex!

Nobody said that. Talk about straw men!

I don’t. I’m still an agnostic. I just don’t tell people that if I think they won’t understand and it isn’t worth the time explaining it to them.