To me it did, because the 9/11 narrative was based on a bunch of lies and so when “covid” rolled around I was ready for some of the lies that would be happening with this event.
We knew it was a bad idea to support any mandatory lockdowns from the beginning because we saw the destructive “Patriot Act” that came out after 9/11 which was abused.
The positive to me is that I think a lot of people did not go along with the lies enough, and a lot of people are awake and aware of any shenanigans that might be pulled on the population now going forward, even if they don’t agree that “covid” responses were built on a bunch of lies.
following 9/11 it was widely assumed the “government” made the event happen, following many discrepancies in the “official report”, like that building 7 was hit by no plane and yet it somehow came down that day (illogical); it was also proven that the pretext for the Iraq War and passing the “Patriot Act” (that WMDs were possessed and were a threat) was false. Hence people were aware something like this was likely to be tried again.
Covid saw billionaires make trillions while the working class lost money; hence there were obvious financial incentives to either let this virus leak from a lab or to fake its alleged existence. There were also incentives of taking away freedoms, like the “Patriot Act” did before, with various lockdown and mask mandates. We also know that the flu “disappeared” during covid years, hence that likely implies that cases of flu were falsely called “covid” cases: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/
We could discuss more but many on this instance and elsewhere seem to be aware of these issues; I didn’t realize the people on lemm.ee were ignorant of them.