2
Stumbled upon this concept of “pilgrimages”. I feel like it’s become a less
known idea, of traveling with a religious purpose to a specific religious place.
I guess for me it gives more of a purpose to travel, which sometimes otherwise
seems to seem less appealing to me. (I’ve heard the word “travel” comes from a
word related to “torture” because travel used to be a lot more difficult before
modern times) Any thoughts on the topic of religious pilgrimages? Catholic
encyclopedia on pilgramages: https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12085a.htm
[https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12085a.htm] > Once theophanies are localized,
pilgrimages necessarily follow. The Incarnation was bound inevitably to draw men
across Europe to visit the Holy Places, for the custom itself arises
spontaneously from the heart. It is found in all religions. The Egyptians
journeyed to Sekket’s shrine at Bubastis or to Ammon’s oracle at Thebes; the
Greeks sought for counsel from Apollo at Delphi and for cures from Asclepius at
Epidaurus; the Mexicans gathered at the huge temple of Quetzal; the Peruvians
massed in sun-worship at Cuzco and the Bolivians in Titicaca. But it is evident
that the religions which centered round a single character, be he god or
prophet, would be the most famous for their pilgrimages, not for any reason of
tribal returns to a central district where alone the deity has power, but rather
owing to the perfectly natural wish to visit spots made holy by the birth, life,
or death of the god or prophet. Hence Buddhism and Mohammedanism are especially
famous in inculcating this method of devotion. Huge gatherings of people
intermittently all the year round venerate Kapilavastu where Gaukama Gaukama
Buddha began his life, Benares where he opened his sacred mission, Kasinagara
where he died; and Mecca and Medina have become almost bywords in English as the
goals of long aspirations, so famous are they for their connexion with the
prophet of Islam. … > Again it may be noted how, when the penitential system of
the Church, which grouped itself round the sacrament of the confessional, had
been authoritatively and legally organized, pilgrimages were set down as
adequate punishments inflicted for certain crimes. The hardships of the journey,
the penitential garb worn, the mendicity it entailed made a pilgrimage a real
and efficient penance (Beazley, “Dawn of Modern Geography”, II, 139; Furnival,
“The Stacions of Rome and the Pilgrim’s Sea Voyage”, London, 1867, 47). To quote
a late text, the following is one of the canons enacted under King Edgar
(959-75): “It is a deep penitence that a layman lay aside his weapons and travel
far barefoot and nowhere pass a second night and fast and watch much and pray
fervently, by day and by night and willingly undergo fatigue and be so squalid
that iron come not on hair or on nail” (Thorpe, “Ancient Laws”, London, 1840,
411-2; cf. 44, 410, etc.).
I learned something new. Yea you’re pretty chill dude
I actually had a friend in highschool who was in a Christian rock band. I also had a friend in uni who was a Jehovah’s witness. He’s the only African I’ve met who isn’t mostly really upbeat and chipper. In fact I have never met a Jehovah’s witness who did look happy. Now seventh day Adventists always seem happy. Mormons smile A LOT but it’s not a happy smile. Evangelists have what I refer to as “the glassy eyed stare of the evangelist” kind of like the book of revelations is playing on repeat in their head.
The important thing to remember is that the threshold for religious activities is much higher in Europe. By which i mean that if someone goes to church and is in a Christian rock band in America, no big deal. In Europe it means they’re a fanatic. Most people who say they are Christian in Scotland or Scandinavia never really go to church outside of weddings and funerals.