• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s tons of conditions

    when certain conditions are met, including in heavy traffic jams, during the daytime, on spec ific California and Nevada freeways, and when the car is traveling less than 40 mph. Drivers can focus on other activities until the vehicle alerts them to resume control.

    I doubt this is a mistake, they must have really high confidence in the tech as well as with the restrictions, not even Tesla had the balls to announce that you could drive distracted.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      not even Tesla had the balls to announce that you could drive distracted.

      That’s the difference between Level 2 and Level 3 full self driving. Teslas are Level 2.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s what I’m saying, they could have called this a “Ultra advanced level 2” and avoided opening themselves up to a TON of liabilities. Once you start saying this is a level 3 system and you don’t need to pay attention to the road with it, well, that shuts the door to many defenses they could use of it was “just” level 2 if something happens. So that means they must be really confident in their system