• Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Because we’re actually biped rats?

    Just kidding. Grapes have lots of tartaric acid and, accordingly to this link, tartaric acid causes kidney failure in dogs.

    Then accordingly to this link only 15~20% of the tartaric acid consumed by humans is eliminated in the urine; most of it goes to the large intestine, and gets metabolised by bacteria. So I guess that, unlike dogs, we avoid the kidney failure by avoiding sending it to the kidneys.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesting, that makes sense, thank you. I looked this up like 3 times using google and duckduckgo and none of the results gave me a clear answer.

      • Mkengine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is the first result when I search with Kagi, so maybe you should switch your search engine. With Google’s degrading performance you hear more and more about alternative engines, for example Qwant and Metager are based in the EU and care a bit more about your privacy than their profit in comparison to Google.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I searched this through DDG, but I likely used different prompts than you:

        • reason toxicity raisins dogs
        • reason toxicity grapes dogs
        • tartaric acid human toxicity metabolism

        then parsed it into the answer I gave you.

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you want some tips on searching…

            Split the problem into smaller parts. For example, you won’t find good results comparing grape toxicity in dogs and humans; but you might get good results for dogs alone.

            Use the info from one search to fuel other searches. For example, once I found that raw grapes were also poisonous to dogs, I shifted the query from raisins to grapes - because it’s easier to find info on a fruit than on its processed form. I did this again once I discovered that tartaric acid was to blame, it allowed me to search for info specifically for humans.

            Use keywords, not full sentences. All those “why”, “is”, “the” etc. only add noise, and make you land right into SEO-land.

            Quotation marks and the minus sign. I did neither here, but use them deliberately, to force (quotation marks) or exclude (minus) results. The minus is specially useful against SEO.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      What pushed you to write such stupid reply on a community where people ask about stuff?

      Seriously.

  • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Only anecdotal but I grew up on a vineyard and my dogs ate grapes, raisins, sultanas all day and all have lived 11-14yo (GSP breed)

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. We grew grapes too, multiple varieties. Dogs ate them and had zero ill effects. One of them even stole one of those 1 lb chocolate bars and ate it, the worst effect was a little diarrhea.

      Some of these things are way overblown on the internet. OMG your St Bernard ate a grape?!? I’m sure a lot of it has to do with dog weight vs quantity consumed, so a bunch of chocolate for a Chihuahua is a different story vs a German Shepherd. I’m not suggesting it’s OK for dogs to eat these things, just exercise some judgement and call a vet, but the internet freakout is unreasonable.