• pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Fuck gawd damn, I don’t know who I’m angrier at more: myself or the joke writer.

    The humor lies in the dual meaning of the horticultural labor task and the selective bias fallacy having the same idiomatic phrase of “cherry picking”. And that is all there is to the humor.

    Right?

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If you don’t get the Jo try this:

    Citing extensive experience, anti-vaxers are hired by cherry farm as cherry pickers.

    One such cherry picker was shown to pick cherries 340% faster than non-anti-vax pickers. The anti-vax cherry picking spokesman was heard to be explaining that this data proves anti-vaxers are the superior farm laborers, and expects the farm to see a correlation in overall productivity improvement across farms employing anti-vax cherry pickers.

  • illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Thanks for the title, I think I’d never got it otherwise

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This sounds like sarcasm, but the joke legitimately didn’t click for me until I scanned the title again.

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It wasn’t. I legitimately wouldn’t get it otherwise. Which I also don’t necessarily see as a bad thing either in this case.

  • jettrscga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This picture is going to be cited by someone as actual evidence against vaccines. I guarantee it.