• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    2 months ago

    One death is coincidental, two is suspicious, any more and it’s gonna become plainly obvious, and now there’s 10. That’s just delicious. They can’t silence them all.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Even one death under these circumstances is not a coincidence, and that ought to be coded into law. You’d better fucking well hope the person who blows a whistle on you is healthy - that’s the world we should move towards. Not that that couldn’t also be abused, but the pendulum is way too fucking far this way.

    • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      The first wasn’t coincidental. He said “hey they might murder me” then he died right before testifying.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can’t or won’t?

      Seriously, though, I wouldn’t be surprised, if a bunch of suicides or “retractions” are happening soon.

      How about 2 million if you shut up? No? How about we publish this dirt on you? Would be a shame, if some nameless robber orphans your children.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      But you wont argue that 10 dead whistblowers can still be a tremendous coincidence, right?