The fact that developers have to cater to multiple platforms that have hardware limitations and different operating systems has led to worse quality of games of time. Console exclusives are anti-competitive, monopolistic, and they lead to a terrible consumer experience.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Really? Some of the best games out there are (or were for a long time) exclusive to one platform.

    I’d much rather have a God of War, or Tears of the Kingdom, or a Half Life Alyx than a sea of endless Assassins Creed or Call of Duty games.

    You want to look at who is killing PC games, look no further than Nvidia’s pricing and pushing devs to use RT features their competitors cannot match.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The graphics card has become the single most expensive part in a gaming PC by far, it’s ridiculous. Because of how crazy nvidia has been with their pricing, and AMD being happy to match them in pricing, I’m fine sticking with my eight year old PC. Most games I play are older anyway. I think eventually integrated GPUs will be considered “good enough” that most PCs won’t be using a dedicated graphics card, just like how dedicated sound cards aren’t the norm anymore. The downside would be having to get a new CPU to have a new GPU as well, but with even low-end graphics cards being ridiculously expensive, you’d basically be getting a free CPU upgrade with your GPU upgrade.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I’m part of the gang keeping the trusty 1060 in the top GPUs on Steam.

        If there was a PS5 priced PC of similar spec I’d be all over it. As it stands I’ll just not upgrade until my current one dies.