It was me who liked HFY. for the stories, not the moderation
It was me who liked HFY. for the stories, not the moderation
deleted by creator
I believe it’s what they learned growing up on YouTube/social media. Demonetization is why content is censored, but when perceived from a child’s eyes, without that context, it can easily be seen as “the norm”.
I defended @beaver@lemmy.ca when a comment of theirs was reported.
I was just given context on this. Looking at their comments in that light, I have decided to ban them from !unpopularopinion@lemmy.world for all their bad faith arguments. Banning people for “bad faith” voting is bullshit. Coming here to defend that horrible action will not be tolerated.
admins of other instances can see who voted, and what they voted. You can easily build a self-hosted copy so you’re an admin, federate with Lemmy.world, and see who is voting on a post/comment.
Mods cannot see who votes on a post/comment, so this is the only way.
sadly, you’re wrong in this instance.
The mission made up of Ms. Patten and nine experts – which was not investigative in nature –…
(emphasis in original news brief).
According to the actual report:
The present report is submitted to the United Nations Secretary-General pursuant to the mandate of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict (SRSG-SVC), outlined by the Security Council in resolutions 1888 (2009), 1960 (2010), 2106 (2013), 2331 (2016), and 2467 (2019). This report contains the findings of the mission of Special Representative, Ms. Pramila Patten to Israel
(emphasis added)
So, she wasn’t a no-name 3rd party, but wasn’t an investigative envoy.
Good call.
This is not the topic at hand
Thank God
You don’t like how we do things? Volunteer to mod! I have a full time job, and do what I can. You don’t like what you see? Be the change, or stop complaining.
dubv is a weird one. You can ignore that one, as it does it to everybody. I think it’s someone’s self-hosted instance. Being banned there means nothing.
Looks like a mod in news didn’t know that the ban on FlyingSquid was intentional, and unbanned them thinking I banned them by mistake. I’ll fix that.
I moderate politicalmemes. I’m used to it :P
With that said, I appreciate the well wishes.
so confused. I changed nothing! I swear! Anyways, cool, and thanks for the feedback.
apparently I can’t Lemmy today. Maybe I should eat something :(
It very well could be a crosspost issue. Checking…
some were comments, and I grabbed posts. sorry
https://lemmy.world/comment/11732533 https://lemmy.world/comment/10687342
Now the cat is out of the bag, I am the one who put it to a vote. I came in to this thread to see if I could get Linkerbaan to at least apologize for actions/words, but they are more interested in “winning” the argument.
Right now, it’s not looking good, but we need quite a few more people to vote to know for sure.
The Shroud of Turin: the real origin