• TinyBreak@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Better allocation of spectrum is not just for social media. That’s like saying nbn was not needed as what we had before was fast enough for email.

    Kind of disagree. NBN didnt cost network to deploy. Well, kind of but kind of not. What does faster netflix mean to someone in a fringe 3g area when we upgrade their 5GN that they cant get anyway?

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wow, really, because my copper line with a dedicated power source to be always on is now gone from my house.

      Irrespective of the nbn, dismissing bandwdth increases as unneeded as peoples internet use doesn’t meet your standards reeks of tony Abbott complaining about nbn as gamers would waste more time online.

      • TinyBreak@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I dont think you “get” it. I’m saying people are going to be cut off. 5g simply doesnt reach as far, its coverage range is greatly reduced compared to 3g or even 4g. And there is no solution for that. the telcos sure as shit arnt gonna go out there and build a bunch more towers for no one except a koala or 2 to regularly use. We’re cutting the service to a not 0% of the population.

        This might be fine in Europe, But not a large country like us.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          get it. I dont think we should dismiss using more bandwith as pointless.

          I also think its unreasonable to expect a private company maintain an unprofitable portion of the network. If we wanted coverage like that, it should be part of their licence to ensure its like for like. I dont know stats in Australia but I known in the USA which is more deregulated than here, they are building .ore towers to maintain coverage.

          We are a big country, but as much as the stereotyoe is bush, we have more people in urban areas. That doesn’t make us smaller to provide coverage but I’d be surprised if we aren’t building more towers too. Anybtine there ISNA switch in tech, there will be winners and losers. We need to ensure more winners than losers.

          Dismissing the improvements as unnecessary or unhelpful doesn’t lead to constructive discussion.

          • TinyBreak@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you’re not an Aussie? Cool ok so you’ve got no idea what this country is like. That makes sense.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Lol, no. Like most if this country, I live in a metro area.

              Unlike the USA which has a higher percent living rural or in low population density areas. Its juatbthat we alsonhave a lot of empty space.

              Even if I wasnt Australian, my point would still stand, so all youre doing is showing the weakness of yours.