“It’s so hard to get movies made, and in these big movies that get made — and it’s even starting to happen with the little ones, which is what’s really freaking me out — decisions are being made by committees, and art does not do well when it’s made by committee,” she added. “Films are made by a filmmaker and a team of artists around them. You cannot make art based on numbers and algorithms. My feeling has been for a long time that audiences are extremely smart, and executives have started to believe that they’re not. Audiences will always be able to sniff out bullshit. Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren’t going to fucking want to see those.”

  • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Strongly agree with nepotism being bad, but why would talented actors/artists retire? They live through their performance, and we the people enjoy watching.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Because the Rock is probably already half a billionaire; he doesn’t need any more fucking money.

      If they want to work for free, fine, whatever. Otherwise, let other people enjoy some opportunities for once.

      • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        We may have a very different opinion on who a talented actor is then. ) Talented businessman is not equal to a talented actor, just a popular one that can sell.