• Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’re the perfect audience for their paper. Let them know what parts weren’t clear or convincing. There’s always something.

  • Rexelpitlum@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    l often think the same until I actually have a chance to talk to the people in question.

    Most times it turns out they are quite similar to me.

    You are probably better than you think you are!

  • Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s how I feel during code review sometimes. Looking over someone’s code who is clearly way more experienced than me is interesting

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same. I’ve been on both ends though.

      Where my peer is either above or below my skill level.

      So low they can’t read it. So high thier shit would be 3x longer than mine…

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They can see blue and yellow, also green, and “browns”. They don’t have red receptors so red orange and purple look grey/ brown to them.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Every morning, your brain getting ready to read content relating to your focus of interest from multiple sources on multiple topics from different styles of writers be like

    • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      i’d say that’s the point? the dog is looking at the limited colours it can see, not comprehending that the researcher that laid out the graph has an increased ability in perceiving colours.

      it’s a manifestation of the dunning-kruger effect.