I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    antifa

    Yeah, the famous antifa-tankers. Every single person I’ve ever seen that identifies as antifa was a tanker. Other people run away from that label.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 days ago

      I really hate that I need to point this out, because I feel like it will derail the discussion from Hexbear to fascism:

      “Antifa” boils down to “people who actively oppose fascism”, instead of either supporting it or sitting on their hands while doing jack shit.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Is there something in the name requiring people to support fascism if it wears the right color?

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 days ago

          Is there something in the name requiring people to support fascism if it wears the right color?

          Do some people fighting fascism (aka antifa) go overboard? Yes, certainly; that’s bound to happen with any movement, group, or cohort.

          For example, someone might miss the target due to witch hunting, or adopt an “ends always justify means” mindset, or even conflate “non-suporter = enemy”.

          However. By implying that “antifa is fascism wearing a different colour”, like you are doing, you’re showing to not understand the obvious difference between

          • individuals following an ideology grounded on xenophobia, nationalism, racism, militarism, censorship, suppression of your individuality by force, more often than not sexism, homophobia and transphobia; and
          • individuals who don’t want the shit above to transform their lives into living hells, including some willing to use force to fight back.

          This conflation between both groups is not just immoral. It’s worse - it stinks stupidity and similar filth from a distance. As such I’m not wasting my time further with you, go chew some grass.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Maybe you can clear this up then:

        Why does everyone there unequivocally, wholeheartedly, unquestionably support Russia?

        Russia has barely a trace of communism anymore and it is hard right oligarchy that fits almost every definition of fascism. Not to mention HEAVILY racist and anti-LGBTQ (I have multiple friends who were from Russia and they were the ones who originally told me that before I saw it for myself in Russia)

        Yet the “antifa” hexbear will literally down vote you to hell and ban you if you say anything even slightly bad about Russia.

        Also news@hexbear is 80% articles about the war with everyone citing Russian propaganda as absolute truth and every western media, every human rights group, etc… is completely lying about the war.

        An interesting juxtaposition as they are in the same way pro Palestine and cite those human rights groups as telling the absolute truth in that case

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          I don’t know for sure. I’ll voice a strong belief in this regard, but take it with a grain of salt.

          I think that Hexbear’s views on Russia is a specific case of a general tendency that you see all across social media (not just HB or Lemmy): to dichotomise complex matters into exactly one good side and exactly one bad side, while assuming that everyone belongs to those two bags. It should go like:

          1. NATO bad.
          2. NATO fights Russia.
          3. Criticism against Russia assumed to be NATO support.
          4. Since NATO bad, NATO supporter bad.
          5. Anyone who would otherwise criticise both NATO and Russia gets screeched at, and eventually shuts up.
          6. “Russia good” becomes part of a local consensus.

          It gets messier when you add Ukraine into the equation, or consider people conflating governments and populations, but it should give you an idea - it starts with somewhat sane premises but quickly devolves into insane lack of logic.

          It explains nicely why they’re supporting Palestine, even with the apparent contradiction: Israel is associated with USA and thus with NATO.

          IMO their dichotomy in this topic is idiotic. However it is not just from their part, and blaming specifically Hexbear for this, like some people would do, would be unjust (and a self-demonstrating example). We, people using the internet in the 20s, are collectively doing it.

          By the way, you see another example of the general phenomenon in this comment chain. Ctrl+F “elephant shit” and look at the comment I was replying to - “you either treat two types of bad as the same, or you’re defending one.”

          [Now I probably drew the ire of all sides at the same time. Frankly? I don’t give a fuck; I’m too old and grumpy to play along.]

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      Most antifa groups are anarchist collectives. So I’m not sure where you’re seeing this, unless it’s solely from people that are terminally online.