• Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, that knife isn’t made of atoms, that knife is made of pure solid quarks. That’s why it can cut atomic nuclei.

  • parlaptie@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’re gonna need a community for comedy homicide for this. That last panel ruins it.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Then he went on to make lemonade with strawberries and heavy water. Deuterium, you get me? Strawberry fusion lemonade.

    • portuga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      No I don’t get it. But I would like to. Is this one of those scenarios where three physicists walk into a bar, each one tells a joke but none of it are funny so no one gets it?

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The moment I wrote it, I was hearing it in the voice of Benny Safdie in his first scene as weirdo Edward Teller, in “Oppenheimer”.

        • portuga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Didn’t watch the movie, probably why it went over my head. Sorry 🤷‍♂️

          • niktemadur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            No Oppenheimer?!!
            Your geek credentials are hereby revoked until further notice!
            Or until you atone!

              • niktemadur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                It’s a movie about physics, with characters like Niels Bohr featured prominently, which just so happened to be made for general audiences and it was a hit, by a director whose other historical film was about Dunkirk.

                Before these movies were made, the subjects were pretty much obscure to the mainstream. Films like these are regarded as risky for large studios, and it’s widely acknowledged that Christopher Nolan is on the very short list of directors with the blessing to do absolutely whatever they want at large studio scale and budget and that is not part of a franchise. And by “very short list” I mean people like Stanley Kubrick.

                The “mainstream” label on Oppenheimer is incidental, after the fact.

                • portuga@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I would watch an edit of the movie that only featured the physics part of it. It’s the boring part I don’t have time for

            • portuga@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Subject matter doesn’t appeal to me much, and I’m also not very fond of the lead actor (no particular reason, he’s a great actor) If it serves as consolation I only watched like 15min of barbie, either

              • Ziglin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I didn’t make it through 5min of Barbie lol

                Oppenheimer was good and had nice music too.

  • BennyInc@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s easy to explain, having cut a lot of cucumbers in my life. Since the actual nucleus of an atom is much smaller than the atom including its electrons itself, the probability of hitting the protons or neutrons is so small, that I’d need to live for a few thousand years and cut 1 cucumber per second nonstop, before this scenario happens even once. It is not impossible, just very improbable.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know very little about physics and I’m pretty sure you could cut cucumbers with a knife until the end of time and you’ll never trigger a nuclear explosion.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ok if it is theoretically possible to cut atoms by using metal knives then why didn’t ever a fission happen? I mean if you combine all knife cutting in the whole world since knives exist, the probability should be pretty high.

      • BennyInc@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, it probably happened an infinite amount of times already. But the resulting cucumber-detonation just triggers a new Big Bang. We’re on the whatever-millionth reset now. Should end any day now. STOP CUTTING CUCUMBERS, SHEEPLE!!

  • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s gotta be the sharpest knife in existence having a diameter of half an atom…

  • insufferableninja@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    reminds me of yahoo serious splitting a beer atom with a chisel in his shed. young einstein, what a fun movie