• SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I never had the impression that there were enough people for the amount of work anyways. I don’t see jobs go, but shift. Most developers will be fine, because of never ending work, AI is just a tool speeding things up. But not that much, as someone who is good with Google and git, is just a bit slower to find the same answers. And AI needs verification too, even if it links you directly to the issue at hand, via source url.

    AI will create new issues. Some of the low level requirement jobs will go, like working in first level support, but only if you learn the AI yourself, else it’s too generic. We’re not there yet, where companies learn their own LLM yet. some outlier try.

    We got to understand that there’s still a human layer and a lot of people might prefer calling a human, even if the result is worse, simply because we’re social beings. This can cost a lot of customers, if companies believe they can just shove an AI in front.

    No one really knows how good AI will get. As the technology advances, we find more and more hard to solve issues, for instance that AI will make things up or gives wrong answers, despite knowing the real answer, if you pressure hard enough.

    Also for security reasons you can’t add AI everywhere, unless you want to send all secrets directly to Microsoft, Google or Facebook.

    My 5 cents.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Missing the point.

      AI won’t so much replace labor as make it more fungible, and thus exploitable/abusable.

      Except where its used as an excuse to just… Not. “Yes we have customer service; its just all chatgpt with no permissions” so nobody can ever return shit that was delivered broken.